...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Effect of the Bamako-Initiative drug revolving fund on availability and rational use of essential drugs in primary health care facilities in south-east Nigeria.
【24h】

Effect of the Bamako-Initiative drug revolving fund on availability and rational use of essential drugs in primary health care facilities in south-east Nigeria.

机译:尼日利亚东南部初级卫生保健机构中的Bamako起始药物周转基金对基本药物的可获得性和合理使用的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the level of availability and rational use of drugs in primary health care (PHC) facilities where the Bamako Initiative (BI) drug revolving fund programme has been operational, with PHC centres where the BI-type of drug revolving fund programme is not yet operational. METHODS: The study was undertaken in 21 PHC centres with BI drug revolving funds and 12 PHC centres without BI drug revolving funds, all in Enugu State of Nigeria. Data were collected on the essential and non-essential drugs stocked by the facilities. Drug use was determined through analyses of prescriptions in each health centre. Finally, the proportion of consumers that were able to remember their dosing schedules was determined. FINDINGS: An average of 35.4 essential drugs was available in the BI health centres compared with 15.3 in the non-BI health centres (p < 0.05). The average drug-stock was adequate for 6.3 weeks in the BI health centres, but for 1.1 weeks in non-BI health centres (p < 0.05). More injections (64.7 vs. 25.6%) and more antibiotics (72.8 vs. 38%) were prescribed in BI health centres than in the non-BI health centres (p < 0.05). The BI health centres had an average of 5.3 drugs per prescription against 2.1 in the non-BI health centres. However, the drugs prescribed by generic name and from the essential drug list were higher in the BI health centres (80 and 93%) than the non-BI health centres (15.5 and 21%, respectively) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was observed that the BI facilities had a better availability of essential drugs both in number and in average stock. However, the BI has given rise to more drug prescribing, which could be irrational. The findings call for strategies to ensure more availability of essential drugs especially in the non-BI PHC centres as a strategy to decrease medical costs and improve the quality of PHC services, while promoting rational drug use in all PHC centres. More detailed studies (for example, by focus group discussion or structured interviews) should be undertaken to find out reasons for the over-prescription and to develop future interventions to correct this.
机译:目的:比较巴马科倡议(BI)药品周转基金计划已在运行的初级卫生保健(PHC)设施中的药品的可获得性和合理使用水平,以及与BI型药品周转基金计划所在的PHC中心进行比较尚未运作。方法:该研究是在21个拥有BI药物循环资金的PHC中心和12个没有BI药物循环资金的PHC中心进行的,所有这些中心都在尼日利亚的Enugu州。收集了有关机构储存的基本和非必需药物的数据。通过分析每个卫生中心的处方来确定药物使用情况。最后,确定了能够记住给药时间表的消费者比例。结果:BI卫生中心平均可获得35.4种基本药物,而非BI卫生中心则为15.3种(p <0.05)。 BI保健中心的平均药品库存量为6.3周,而非BI保健中心的平均库存量为1.1周(p <0.05)。与非BI保健中心相比,BI保健中心开出了更多的针剂(64.7 vs. 25.6%)和更多的抗生素(72.8 vs. 38%)(p <0.05)。 BI保健中心每处方平均有5.3种药物,而非BI保健中心为2.1种。但是,BI保健中心的通用名称和基本药物清单中规定的药物高于非BI保健中心(分别为15.5和21%)(分别为80%和93%)(p <0.05)。结论:据观察,BI设施在数量和平均库存上都有更好的基本药物供应。但是,BI带来了更多的药物处方,这可能是不合理的。调查结果要求采取策略,确保在非BI PHC中心尤其是非BI PHC中心提供更多的基本药物,以降低医疗成本和提高PHC服务质量,同时在所有PHC中心促进合理用药。应该进行更详细的研究(例如,通过焦点小组讨论或结构化访谈),以找出处方过量的原因,并制定未来的干预措施以纠正这一问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号