...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Health financing in Brazil, Russia and India: what role does the international community play?
【24h】

Health financing in Brazil, Russia and India: what role does the international community play?

机译:巴西,俄罗斯和印度的卫生筹资:国际社会起什么作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we examine whether Brazil, Russia and India have similar financing patterns to those observed globally. We assess how national health allocations compare with epidemiological estimates for burden of disease. We identify the major causes of burden of disease in each country, as well as the contribution HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria make to the total burden of disease estimates. We then use budgetary allocation information to assess the alignment of funding with burden of disease data. We focus on central government allocations through the Ministry of Health or its equivalent. We found that of the three cases examined, Brazil and India showed the most bias when it came to financing HIV/AIDS over other diseases. And this occurred despite evidence indicating that HIV/AIDS (among all three countries) was not the highest burden of disease when measured in terms of age-standardized DALY rates. We put forth several factors building on Reich's (2002) framework on 'reshaping the state from above, from within and from below' to help explain this bias in favour of HIV/AIDS in Brazil and India, but not in Russia: 'above' influences include the availability of external funding, the impact of the media coupled with recognition and attention from philanthropic institutions, the government's close relationship with UNAIDS (UN Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS), WHO (World Health Organization) and other UN bodies; 'within' influences include political and bureaucratic incentives to devote resources to certain issues and relationships between ministries; and 'below' influences include civil society activism and relationships with government. Two additional factors explaining our findings cross-cutting all three levels are the strength of the private sector in health, specifically the pharmaceutical industry, and the influence of transnational advocacy movements emanating from the USA and Western Europe for particular diseases.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了巴西,俄罗斯和印度是否具有与全球观察到的相似的融资模式。我们评估了如何将国家卫生拨款与流行病学估计的疾病负担进行比较。我们确定了每个国家疾病负担的主要原因,以及艾滋病毒/艾滋病,结核病和疟疾对疾病总负担估算的贡献。然后,我们使用预算分配信息来评估资金与疾病负担数据的一致性。我们专注于通过卫生部或同等部门的中央政府拨款。我们发现,在所调查的三个案例中,巴西和印度在资助艾滋病毒/艾滋病而非其他疾病方面表现出最大的偏见。尽管有证据表明,以年龄标准化的DALY比率衡量,艾滋病毒/艾滋病(在所有三个国家中)并不是最大的疾病负担,但这种情况还是发生了。我们基于Reich(2002)的“从上,内,下重塑国家”框架提出了几个因素,以帮助解释这种偏向于在巴西和印度(而不是俄罗斯)偏爱艾滋病毒/艾滋病的偏见:“高于”影响包括外部资金的可获得性,媒体的影响,慈善机构的认可和关注,政府与联合国艾滋病规划署(联合国艾滋病毒/艾滋病联合规划署),世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)和其他联合国机构的密切关系; “内部”影响力包括政治和官僚主义的动机,以将资源用于某些问题和各部委之间的关系; “以下”影响包括公民社会行动主义和与政府的关系。解释我们的发现贯穿所有三个层面的另外两个因素是私营部门在卫生领域(尤其是制药行业)的实力以及美国和西欧的跨国倡导运动对特定疾病的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号