首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >The 2015 emergency care reform in Poland: Some improvements, some unmet demands and some looming conflicts
【24h】

The 2015 emergency care reform in Poland: Some improvements, some unmet demands and some looming conflicts

机译:2015年波兰的急诊医疗改革:一些改进,一些未满足的需求以及一些迫在眉睫的冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Between 2006 and 2015, the Act on the State Emergency Medical System was the key act governing the organization, financing and provision of emergency care in Poland. From the moment it entered into force, it had been heavily criticized. The critique focused, among others, on the lack of provisions allowing for emergency medical services (EMS) to be performed outside the EMS units, the lack of a separate Act regulating the profession of a medical rescuer and the lack of a separate professional organization representing medical rescuers. As early as 2008 a team of specialists was set up to work on amending the Act and these works resulted in the draft Act on the State Emergency Medical System that was submitted to public consultations on 19 August, 2014. This draft was further reworked in 2015 and was signed by the President on 25 September of the same year. The Act addressed some of the shortcomings of the EMS legislation that was previously in place. However, the new Act did not meet the key demands of medical rescuers; namely, it did not introduce a separate legal act regulating this profession nor established a professional organisation representing their interests. An analysis of the vested interests of various groups of medical professionals indicates that these interests are likely to have influenced the final legislative outcome. The Act, as well as its implementing executive regulation from April 2016, may reduce support of certain medical professional groups during the Act's implementation as well as create tensions between these groups, especially between medical rescuers and nurses. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
机译:在2006年至2015年期间,《国家紧急医疗系统法》是管理波兰组织,筹集资金和提供紧急护理的关键法案。自生效之日起,就受到了严厉批评。批评主要集中在以下方面:缺少允许在EMS部门以外进行紧急医疗服务(EMS)的规定,缺少规范医疗救援人员职业的单独法案以及缺乏代表医疗救护人员专业的单独组织医疗救援人员。早在2008年,就成立了一个专家团队来修改该法案,这些工作产生了《国家紧急医疗系统法案》草案,该草案已于2014年8月19日提交公众咨询。该草案于2015年进行了重新设计并于同年9月25日由总统签署。该法案解决了以前制定的EMS法规的一些缺陷。但是,新法案没有满足医疗救援人员的关键要求。也就是说,它没有制定单独的法律法规来规范该行业,也没有建立代表他们利益的专业组织。对各种医疗专业人员的既得利益进行的分析表明,这些利益可能会影响最终的立法结果。该法案及其自2016年4月起实施的执行法规可能会在法案实施期间减少某些医疗专业团体的支持,并在这些团体之间,特别是在医疗救援人员和护士之间造成紧张关系。 (C)2016作者。由Elsevier Ireland Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号