首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Hospital financing: Calculating inpatient capital costs in Germany with a comparative view on operating costs and the English costing scheme
【24h】

Hospital financing: Calculating inpatient capital costs in Germany with a comparative view on operating costs and the English costing scheme

机译:医院融资:计算德国的住院资金成本,并比较运营成本和英语成本核算方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The paper analyzes the German inpatient capital costing scheme by assessing its cost module calculation. The costing scheme represents the first separated national calculation of performance-oriented capital cost lump sums per DRG. Methods: The three steps in the costing scheme are reviewed and assessed: (1) accrual of capital costs; (2) cost-center and cost category accounting; (3) data processing for capital cost modules. The assessment of each step is based on its level of transparency and efficiency. A comparative view on operating costing and the English costing scheme is given. Results: Advantages of the scheme are low participation hurdles, low calculation effort for G-DRG calculation participants, highly differentiated cost-center/cost category separation, and advanced patient-based resource allocation. The exclusion of relevant capital costs, nontransparent resource allocation, and unclear capital cost modules, limit the managerial relevance and transparency of the capital costing scheme. Conclusions: The scheme generates the technical premises for a change from dual financing by insurances (operating costs) and state (capital costs) to a single financing source. The new capital costing scheme will intensify the discussion on how to solve the current investment backlog in Germany and can assist regulators in other countries with the introduction of accurate capital costing. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:目标:本文通过评估其成本模块计算来分析德国住院病人资本成本计划。成本核算方案代表了针对每个DRG的基于绩效的资本成本总和的第一个单独的国家计算。方法:对成本计划中的三个步骤进行审查和评估:(1)资本成本的计提; (2)成本中心和成本类别核算; (3)资本成本模块的数据处理。每个步骤的评估均基于其透明度和效率水平。给出了运营成本和英语成本计划的比较观点。结果:该方案的优点是参与障碍少,G-DRG计算参与者的计算工作量少,成本中心/成本类别分离高度差异化以及基于患者的高级资源分配。排除相关的资本成本,不透明的资源分配以及不清楚的资本成本模块,限制了资本成本计划的管理相关性和透明度。结论:该计划为从保险(运营成本)和州(资本成本)的双重融资转变为单一融资来源提供了技术前提。新的资本成本计划将加剧关于如何解决德国目前的投资积压的讨论,并可以通过引入准确的资本成本来协助其他国家的监管机构。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号