首页> 外文期刊>Health Physics: Official Journal of the Health Physics Society >Hypothesis testing, statistical power, and confidence limits in the presence of epistemic uncertainty.
【24h】

Hypothesis testing, statistical power, and confidence limits in the presence of epistemic uncertainty.

机译:假设不确定性存在时的假设检验,统计功效和置信度限制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Hypothesis testing, statistical power, and confidence limits are concepts from classical statistics that require data from observations. In some important recent applications some of the data are not observational but are reconstructed by computer models. There is generally epistemic uncertainty in model formulations, as well as in parameter and input values. The resulting epistemic uncertainty of the reconstructed data is determined by an uncertainty analysis and is expressed by subjective probability distributions. Sometimes only the mean or median values of the distributions are used in the concepts mentioned above, which hides the uncertainty of the data thereby rendering misleading results. Misleading results are also obtained if the epistemic uncertainty of the data is combined incorrectly with the stochastic variability of the outcome of the actual random complex concerned. This paper argues that an uncertainty analysis of the application of classical statistical concepts is essentially the correct way of dealing with the epistemic uncertainty of the data. A practical example serves as an illustration.
机译:假设检验,统计功效和置信度限制是经典统计中的概念,需要观察数据。在最近的一些重要应用中,某些数据不是观测数据,而是通过计算机模型重建的。通常在模型公式以及参数和输入值中存在认知不确定性。通过不确定性分析确定重建数据产生的认知不确定性,并通过主观概率分布表示。有时,在上述概念中仅使用分布的平均值或中值,这掩盖了数据的不确定性,从而导致产生误导性的结果。如果数据的认知不确定性与实际相关随机复合物的结果的随机变异性不正确地组合,也会获得误导性结果。本文认为,对经典统计概念应用的不确定性分析本质上是处理数据的认知不确定性的正确方法。一个实际的例子作为说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号