【24h】

Corporations as Lawmakers

机译:公司作为立法者

获取原文
       

摘要

This Article argues that multinational corporations have acquired the power to create primary rules of international law, at stark cost to the state's regulatory autonomy. It is widely recognized that states have granted private business corporations significant capacities to act on the international stage, including the capacity to bear international legal rights and even to directly enforce their rights through compulsory international adjudication, But what has gone relatively unnoticed is the corporation's emergent capacity to directly and formally author its international legal rights, by agreement with sovereign states, via an "internationalized" power of contract. This Article explains how this power of contract amounts to something more than a mere commercial power to engage foreign sovereigns in private legal agreements. It represents no less than the capacity to author meaningful and enforceable international legal norms, with priority over the domestic law of the state party facially limited to the economic sphere, but with dramatic ripples throughout all domains of public life. I argue that this power arises out of the confluence of three seemingly disparate doctrinal shifts in international investment law and human rights jurisprudence, concerning: the legal status of state contracts; the theory of transnational property; and the law of corporate nationality. Finally, I turn a critical eye to these developments, drawing theoretical insights from domestic private law and public international law, I conclude that international legal doctrine has gone too far in empowering multinationals against the state, while remaining too hesitant to demand any form of corporate accountability.
机译:本文认为,跨国公司已经拥有制定国际法基本规则的权力,而国家的监管自主权却付出了巨大的代价。众所周知,国家赋予了私营商业公司在国际舞台上采取行动的巨大能力,包括拥有国际法律权利的能力,甚至通过强制性国际裁决直接行使其权利的能力。但是,相对未引起注意的是,该公司的出现通过与主权国家达成协议,通过“国际化”合同权直接和正式创作其国际法律权利的能力。本文解释了合同的这种力量如何不仅仅具有使外国主权者参与私人法律协议的商业力量。它代表着起草有意义和可执行的国际法律规范的能力,其优先于表面上限于经济领域的缔约国的国内法,但在整个公共生活的各个领域都有着巨大的涟漪。我认为,这种权力源于国际投资法和人权法学三个看似截然不同的教义变迁的融合,这些变迁涉及:国家合同的法律地位;跨国财产理论;以及公司国籍法。最后,我对这些事态发展持批判性的眼光,从国内私法和国际公法学中汲取了理论见解,得出的结论是,国际法律学说在赋予跨国公司抵抗国家权力方面已经走得太远了,而仍然犹豫不决,要求任何形式的公司问责制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号