首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >The role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy combined with endoscopic management of impacted cystic duct stones in patients with high surgical risk.
【24h】

The role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy combined with endoscopic management of impacted cystic duct stones in patients with high surgical risk.

机译:体外冲击波碎石术结合内镜处理胆囊结石的手术对高手术风险患者的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cholecystoscopic lithotripsy can be an alternative procedure for the treatment of impacted cystic duct stones in patients who are high risk for surgery. Conventional methods, including electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), occasionally fail due to the inability to access or capture the impacted stones in the narrow, spirally long cystic duct. Using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) may be more effective to disintegrate cystic duct stones. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of ESWL in the endoscopic treatment of impacted cystic duct stones in patients with high operative risk. METHODOLOGY: Eleven patients with impacted cystic duct stones who were at high risk for surgery were included in this study. All of them had had a failed initial attempt of percutaneous transhepatic cholecystoscopic lithotripsy (PTCCS-L) followed by percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy. Patients underwent ESWL to disintegrate cystic duct stones with endoscopic removal of fragmented stones. RESULTS: Complete removal of cystic duct stones was achieved in 9 of 11 patients (81.8%). One of the 9 patients (11.1%) was treated solely with ESWL, but the other 8 patients (88.9%) required cholecystoscopic removal of residual fragmented stones after ESWL. Fragmented stones passing through the cystic duct impacted in ampullary region in 3 patients after ESWL. Two patients required transpapillary removal of stones. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stone removal after ESWL for impacted cystic duct stones is a difficult and time-consuming procedure. But, it seems to be a relatively safe alternative to surgery in patients with high surgical risk.
机译:背景/目的:胆囊镜碎石术可以作为治疗高手术风险患者的受累胆囊管结石的替代方法。常规方法,包括电液碎石术(EHL),有时由于无法进入或捕获狭窄的螺旋状长囊性导管中的结石而失败。使用体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)可能会更有效地瓦解胆囊管结石。这项研究的目的是评估ESWL在高手术风险患者的内镜治疗受累胆囊管结石中的作用。方法:本研究包括11例具有高手术风险的囊性胆管结石受累患者。他们所有人的经皮经肝穿刺胆囊镜碎石术(PTCCS-L),然后经皮经肝穿刺胆囊造瘘术的最初尝试均失败。患者经ESWL内镜切除碎裂性结石,使胆囊管结石崩解。结果:11例患者中有9例(81.8%)完全清除了胆囊管结石。 9例患者中的1例(11.1%)仅接受ESWL治疗,而其他8例患者(88.9%)需要在ESWL术后进行胆囊镜检查以清除残留的碎石。 ESWL后3例患者的胆囊区域中,碎裂的结石穿过胆囊管。两名患者需要经乳头状结石摘除。结论:ESWL后内镜下结石清除胆囊管结石是一个困难且耗时的过程。但是,对于具有高手术风险的患者,它似乎是相对安全的替代手术方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号