首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years.
【24h】

Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years.

机译:至少随访四年的非早期直肠癌患者的腹腔镜与开放式切除术的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic rectal resection for malignancy is still debated. Concern has been expressed regarding the lack of significant data from larger patient series with longer periods of follow-up. The aims of this study were to compare long-term outcome with a minimum follow-up of four years in unselected patients undergoing either laparoscopic rectal resection or open rectal resection for cancer. METHODOLOGY: From May 1992 to August 1997 all electively admitted patients with rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomized study. Written information was submitted to each patient and the location in each group (laparoscopic or open) was related to the patient's choice. The inclusion protocol criteria excluded T1 tumors. All 68 T2-T4 patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy (5.040 cGy), completed with chemotherapy in selected cases (patients below 70 years of age). Long-term results were compared between the two groups. Follow-up time of both groups ranged between 48 and 96 months (mean, 49.4 months). RESULTS: Excluding patients who underwent a palliative resection or conversion to open surgery and deaths not related to cancer, 53 pts (29 laparoscopic rectal resection, 24 open rectal resection) out of 68 are available and are the object of this study. No patient was lost to follow-up. No wound recurrence was observed. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic rectal resection was 24.1% vs. 25% after open rectal resection (P = 0.799). Distant metastases occurred in 20.7% of patients in the LLR group (laparoscopic rectal resection) vs. 25% in the ORR group (open rectal resection) (P = 0.980). Cumulative survival probability after laparoscopic rectal resection and open rectal resection was 0.690 and 0.625 (P = 0.492), respectively. Cumulative survival probability for Duke's stage A, B and C in the LRR group vs. the ORR group was 1.000 vs. 0.900 (P = 0.585), 0.667 vs. 0.636 (P = 0.496) and 0.429 vs. 0.445 (P = 0.501), respectively. Sixteen laparoscopic rectal resection patients (55.2%) and 12 open rectal resection patients (50%) are presently disease free (P = 0.979). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer were comparable to those after conventional resection, with a trend in favor of the laparoscopic approach that does not reach a statistically significant difference, possibly due to the limited size of the sample.
机译:背景/目的:腹腔镜直肠切除术对恶性肿瘤仍存在争议。对于缺乏来自较大患者系列且随访时间较长的重要数据表示关注。这项研究的目的是比较接受腹腔镜直肠切除术或开放性直肠癌切除术的未选患者的长期预后与至少四年的随访。方法:从1992年5月至1997年8月,所有选择性入院的直肠癌患者均纳入一项前瞻性非随机研究。书面信息已提交给每位患者,并且每组(腹腔镜或开放式)的位置均与患者的选择有关。纳入协议标准排除了T1肿瘤。所有68例T2-T4患者均接受了术前放疗(5.040 cGy),部分病例(70岁以下的患者)接受了化疗。比较了两组的长期结果。两组的随访时间在48到96个月之间(平均49.4个月)。结果:不包括接受姑息性切除或改行开放性手术以及与癌症无关的死亡的患者,共有68例中有53例(29例腹腔镜直肠切除,24例开放性直肠切除)可供使用,是本研究的对象。没有患者失去随访。没有观察到伤口复发。腹腔镜直肠切除术后的局部复发率为24.1%,而开放直肠切除术后的局部复发率为25%(P = 0.799)。 LLR组(腹腔镜直肠切除术)中有20.7%的患者发生了远处转移,而ORR组(开放性直肠切除术)中有25%的患者发生了远处转移(P = 0.980)。腹腔镜直肠切除和开腹直肠切除术后的累积生存率分别为0.690和0.625(P = 0.492)。 LRR组与ORR组的Duke A,B和C期累积生存率分别为1.000对0.900(P = 0.585),0.667对0.636(P = 0.496)和0.429对0.445(P = 0.501) , 分别。目前有16例腹腔镜直肠切除术患者(55.2%)和12例开放性直肠切除术患者(50%)没有疾病(P = 0.979)。结论:腹腔镜切除直肠癌后的长期结果与常规切除后的结果相当,趋势是腹腔镜方法没有统计学上的显着差异,这可能是由于样本量有限所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号