首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Comparison of Effects of Devascularization Versus Shunt on Patients with Portal Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Effects of Devascularization Versus Shunt on Patients with Portal Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

机译:血流重建术与分流术对门静脉高压症患者的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: To systematically evalnate-the effectiveness of devascularization and shunt on patients with portal hypertension. Methodology: Relevant studies compared devascularization and shunt for the treatment of portal hypertension were identified searching the PubMed, Embase, Elsevier, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database and Cochrane Trial Register searches until December 2013. Data of interest for devascularization and shunt inducting postoperative recurrent bleeding, postoperative hepatic encephalopathy, ascites; operative mortality rate, and long term survival rate were subjected to meta-analysis. Results: Eleven studies were included in the study, the results of the meta-analysis showed, that all eleven clinical studies demonstrated a significantly higher postoperative recurrent bleeding rate with devascularization group than with shunt group, the rate of hepatic encephalopathy in the devascularization group was significantly lower compared with the shunt group. Conclusion: Devascularization and shunt have different advantages and disadvantages respectively which reflected in postoperative complications and long term survival rate.
机译:背景/目的:系统评价-血运重建和分流对门静脉高压症患者的有效性。方法:通过对比PubMed,Embase,Elsevier,CNKI(中国国家知识基础设施)数据库和Cochrane试验注册数据库,确定了对比血运和分流治疗门静脉高压症的相关研究,直至2013年12月。血运和分流诱发术后的相关数据反复出血,术后肝性脑病,腹水;对手术死亡率和长期生存率进行荟萃分析。结果:纳入研究11项,荟萃分析结果显示,所有11项临床研究均显示,血运重建组的术后复发出血率明显高于分流组,血运重建组的肝性脑病发生率为与分流组相比明显降低。结论:血运重建和分流术各有优缺点,分别反映在术后并发症和长期生存率上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号