首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Comparison of characteristics of recurrent esophageal varices after endoscopic ligation versus endoscopic ligation plus sclerotherapy.
【24h】

Comparison of characteristics of recurrent esophageal varices after endoscopic ligation versus endoscopic ligation plus sclerotherapy.

机译:内镜结扎与内镜结扎加硬化治疗后食管静脉曲张复发特征的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The characteristics of recurrent esophageal varices after endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) plus endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) versus EVL alone, including the number of additional treatments and patterns of recurrence have been compared. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-four patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices were treated by EVL alone (EVL group), and 46 patients were treated by EVL followed by extravariceal injection sclerotherapy (EVL+extraEIS group). RESULTS: Fewer treatment sessions were needed (p<0.005), and more O-rings were required (p<0.0001) in the EVL group than in the EVL+extraEIS group. The 1- and 3-year cumulative recurrence rates were higher in the EVL group (81.3% and 93.8%) than in the EVL+extraEIS group (62.8% and 91.5%) (p<0.05). Endoscopic examination at first recurrence showed varices of a more severe form (p<0.001), but less frequently having the red color sign (p<0.0001), and intramucosal venous dilatation (p<0.0001) in the EVL group than in the EVL+extraEIS group. The number of rehospitalizations for additional treatment was lower (p<0.0001) and more patients could be managed with only endoscopic treatment for recurrent varices in the EVL group than in the EVL+extraEIS group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Even if the overall rate of variceal recurrence was higher, fewer treatment sessions were needed, and the number of rehospitalizations for these additional treatments was lower in the EVL group than in the EVL+extraEIS group. Multiple sessions of EVL are an effective strategy for the treatment of esophageal varices.
机译:背景/目的:比较内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)加内镜下注射硬化剂治疗(EIS)与单纯EVL后的食管静脉曲张复发特征,包括其他治疗次数和复发方式。方法:对34例肝硬化和食管静脉曲张患者进行EVL单独治疗(EVL组),对46例患者进行EVL静脉曲张硬化注射治疗(EVL + extraEIS组)。结果:与EVL + extraEIS组相比,EVL组需要的治疗次数更少(p <0.005),并且需要更多的O形圈(p <0.0001)。 EVL组的1年和3年累计复发率(81.3%和93.8%)高于EVL + extraEIS组(62.8%和91.5%)(p <0.05)。初次复发时内窥镜检查显示,静脉曲张的静脉曲张比静脉曲张组更严重(p <0.001),但EVL组出现红色信号(p <0.0001)和粘膜内静脉扩张(p <0.0001)的频率较低。 extraEIS组。与EVL + extraEIS组相比,EVL组的内镜治疗复发性静脉曲张可以接受更多的再次住院治疗(p <0.0001),并且更多的患者可以接受内镜治疗。结论:即使静脉曲张的总体复发率较高,EVL组的再住院次数也要比EVL + extraEIS组的少。多次EVL是治疗食管静脉曲张的有效策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号