首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Retrospective study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine alone in cases with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer
【24h】

Retrospective study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine alone in cases with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer

机译:吉西他滨加S-1与单独吉西他滨治疗无法切除的晚期胰腺癌的回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to compare gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy to gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy in cases with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. Methodology: We retrospectively reviewed 107 consecutive patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer who received GEM monotherapy or GS combination chemotherapy between 2004 and 2010. In 73 patients, GEM (1,000mg/m2) was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every four weeks. The GS regimen received by 34 patients consisted of intravenous GEM (1,000mg/m2) on days 1 and 8, combined with oral S-1 (40mg/m2) twice daily on days 1-14, repeated every four weeks. Results: Response rates in the GEM and GS groups (6.8% vs. 32.4%) varied significantly, as did disease control rates (28.8% vs. 61.8%, respectively). There was a significant difference in median overall survival (206 vs. 258 days) and median progression-free survival (86 vs. 123 days) between the GEM and GS groups. Grade 3/4 toxicities in both groups were neutropenia (16.4% in GEM, 17.6% in GS), thrombocytopenia (1.3%, 2.9%), anorexia (1.3%, 0%), and diarrhea (1.3%, 0%). Conclusions: Retrospectively, GS combination therapy is more effective than GEM monotherapy, and therefore should be considered in cases with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer.
机译:背景/目的:这项研究的目的是比较吉西他滨加S-1(GS)联合化疗与吉西他滨(GEM)单药治疗无法切除的晚期胰腺癌的病例。方法:我们回顾性分析了2004年至2010年间接受GEM单一疗法或GS联合化疗的107例不可切除的晚期胰腺癌患者。在73例患者中,在第1、8和15天静脉注射GEM(1,000mg / m2)。四周。 34名患者接受的GS方案包括在第1天和第8天静脉注射GEM(1,000mg / m2),并在第1-14天每天两次口服S-1(40mg / m2),每四周重复一次。结果:GEM和GS组的缓解率(6.8%比32.4%)有显着差异,疾病控制率也有显着差异(分别为28.8%和61.8%)。 GEM和GS组之间的中位总生存期(206天与258天)和无进展生存期的中位(86天与123天)存在显着差异。两组的3/4级毒性分别是中性粒细胞减少症(GEM为16.4%,GS为17.6%),血小板减少症(1.3%,2.9%),厌食症(1.3%,0%)和腹泻(1.3%,0%)。结论:回顾性地,GS联合疗法比GEM单一疗法更有效,因此对于不能切除的晚期胰腺癌应考虑使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号