首页> 外文期刊>Hepatology research: the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology >A randomized clinical trial comparing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with endoscopic sclerotherapy in the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis after recent variceal hemorrhage.
【24h】

A randomized clinical trial comparing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with endoscopic sclerotherapy in the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis after recent variceal hemorrhage.

机译:一项随机临床试验,比较经颈静脉肝内门体分流术与内镜下硬化疗法在近期静脉曲张破裂出血后肝硬化患者的长期治疗中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with that of endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES) in the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis after variceal bleeding. Seventy-eight consecutive cirrhotic patients with recent variceal bleeding were randomly allocated to either TIPS (n=38) or ES (n=40). All patients were in good condition at randomization. The mean follow-up was 1116+/-92 days in the TIPS group and 1047+/-102 days in the ES group. Differences in rebleeding from any source (18.4% vs. 32.5%) and esophageal variceal rebleeding (15.7% vs. 27.5%) were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). The mortality rates were similar in both treatment groups. Shunt dysfunction was noted in 27 patients (71%) in the TIPS group. There were more numbers of rehospitalization during follow-up in the TIPS group than in the ES group (2.6+/-0.4 vs. 1.1+/-0.2) (P<0.01). TIPS and ES are equally effective in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. However, TIPS is associated with high incidence of shunt dysfunction, which lead to more rehospitalization. Therefore, TIPS may not be a first-line treatment for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients who are in stable condition.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)和内窥镜硬化治疗(ES)在曲张静脉出血后肝硬化患者的长期治疗中的疗效。随机将78例近期曲张静脉出血的肝硬化患者随机分为TIPS(n = 38)或ES(n = 40)。所有患者随机分组情况良好。 TIPS组的平均随访时间为1116 +/- 92天,ES组的平均随访时间为1047 +/- 102天。两组的再出血(18.4%vs. 32.5%)和食管静脉曲张再出血(15.7%vs. 27.5%)的差异在两组之间没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。两个治疗组的死亡率相似。 TIPS组中有27名患者(71%)注意到分流功能障碍。随访期间,TIPS组的再入院次数比ES组多(2.6 +/- 0.4对1.1 +/- 0.2)(P <0.01)。 TIPS和ES在预防静脉曲张再出血方面同样有效。但是,TIPS与分流功能障碍的高发有关,导致更多的再次住院。因此,TIPS可能不是预防病情稳定的肝硬化患者曲张再出血的一线治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号