首页> 外文期刊>Hepatology research: the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology >Accuracy and reliability of microbubble ultrasound measurements for the non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C
【24h】

Accuracy and reliability of microbubble ultrasound measurements for the non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

机译:微气泡超声测量在慢性丙型肝炎肝纤维化非侵入性评估中的准确性和可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used to assess liver disease severity non-invasively by observing intra- and extrahepatic hemodynamic changes. Transit times are calculated to include intra- and extrahepatic components (hepatic vein transit time, HVTT) or the intrahepatic component (hepatic transit time, HTT), but these have not been compared directly. We aimed to compare diagnostic accuracy of HVTT and HTT in gauging the severity of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and to assess inter- and intra-observer reliability. Methods: Recorded ultrasound scans performed on 75 patients with biopsy-staged CHC, using the microbubble contrast agent Sonovue were analyzed. Results: Diagnostic accuracy of HTT and HVTT for diagnosis of cirrhosis was 0.78 and 0.71 (P = 0.24). Diagnostic accuracy of HTT and HVTT for diagnosis of fibrosis stage >2 was 0.76 and 0.72 (P = 0.23). Negative predictive value for cirrhosis using this cut-off was high for both techniques (HVTT, 88%; HTT, 92%), suggesting utility for exclusion of cirrhosis. Interobserver reliability for HTT and HVTT were 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. Intra-observer reliability for HTT and HVTT were 0.98 and 0.99. Conclusion: In this cohort, reliability exceeded 90% while diagnostic accuracy was in keeping with previous studies of microbubble transit time analysis. Despite higher numerical diagnostic accuracy for HTT, no significant difference was demonstrated between the techniques, suggesting that both methods can be used reliably.
机译:目的:通过观察肝内和肝外的血流动力学变化,对比增强超声可以无创地评估肝脏疾病的严重程度。计算出的转运时间包括肝内和肝外成分(肝静脉转运时间,HVTT)或肝内成分(肝转运时间,HTT),但尚未直接进行比较。我们旨在比较HVTT和HTT在评估慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)严重程度方面的诊断准确性,并评估观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。方法:对使用微泡造影剂Sonovue对75例活检分期的CHC患者进行的超声记录进行了分析。结果:HTT和HVTT对肝硬化的诊断准确性分别为0.78和0.71(P = 0.24)。 HTT和HVTT在诊断> 2的纤维化分期中的诊断准确度分别为0.76和0.72(P = 0.23)。对于这两种技术,使用该临界值对肝硬化的阴性预测值均很高(HVTT,88%; HTT,92%),提示可用于排除肝硬化。 HTT和HVTT的观察者间可靠性分别为0.92和0.94。 HTT和HVTT的观察者内部可靠性分别为0.98和0.99。结论:在该队列中,可靠性超过90%,而诊断准确性与以前的微泡传输时间分析研究保持一致。尽管HTT的数值诊断准确性更高,但是在这两种技术之间未显示出显着差异,这表明这两种方法均可可靠地使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号