...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemotherapy: International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Chemotherapy >Prulifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections: A multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial
【24h】

Prulifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections: A multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial

机译:普利沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗呼吸道和泌尿道感染:一项多中心,双盲,随机对照临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Prulifloxacin is a promising fluoroquinolone antibiotic. A multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical study was designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared to that of levofloxacin for the treatment of respiratory and urinary infections of Chinese patients. Methods: A total of 267 patients were enrolled and each was randomly assigned to either the treatment or the control group. Prulifloxacin 264.2 mg (equivalent to ulifloxacin 200 mg) b.i.d. or levofloxacin hydrochloride 200 mg b.i.d. was administered orally for 5-14 days according to a patient's condition. The clinical response, bacterial eradication and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. Results: Two hundred and forty-three patients completed the study. For the modified intention-to-treat population, the cure and effective rates were 45.53 and 82.93% in the prulifloxacin group and 49.18 and 83.61% in the levofloxacin group. For the per-protocol analysis population, the cure and effective rates were 45.90 and 83.61% in the prulifloxacin group and 49.59 and 83.47% in the levofloxacin group. The bacterial eradication rates were 96.59 and 95.35%, and the drug-related adverse event rates were 7.87 and 5.51% in the prulifloxacin and levofloxacin group, respectively. The cure rate and efficacy rate of respiratory and urinary tract infections of the levofloxacin group were better than those of the prulifloxacin group. However, the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Prulifloxacin is as effective and well tolerated as levofloxacin in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections.
机译:背景:普鲁沙星是一种有前途的氟喹诺酮抗生素。设计了一项多中心,双盲,随机临床研究,以评估其与左氧氟沙星相比在中国患者呼吸道和泌尿道感染中的疗效和安全性。方法:共纳入267例患者,每个患者随机分为治疗组或对照组。普利沙星264.2 mg(相当于ulifloxacin 200 mg)b.i.d.或盐酸左氧氟沙星200 mg b.i.d.根据患者的病情口服5-14天。评估临床反应,根除细菌和不良事件的发生率。结果:243例患者完成了研究。对于改良意向治疗人群,普鲁沙星组的治愈率和有效率为45.53%和82.93%,左氧氟沙星组的治愈率和有效率为49.18%和83.61%。对于按方案分析的人群,普鲁沙星组的治愈率和有效率分别为45.90和83.61%,左氧氟沙星组的治愈率和有效率为49.59和83.47%。普利沙星和左氧氟沙星组的细菌根除率分别为96.59和95.35%,与药物相关的不良事件发生率分别为7.87和5.51%。左氧氟沙星组的治愈率和呼吸道和尿路感染的疗效均优于普利沙星组。但是,两组之间的差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。结论:普利沙星在治疗呼吸道和泌尿道感染方面与左氧氟沙星一样有效且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号