首页> 外文期刊>Health sociology review: the journal of the Health Section of the Australian Sociological Association >Dreaming the impossible dream: Ordering risks in Australian maternity care policies
【24h】

Dreaming the impossible dream: Ordering risks in Australian maternity care policies

机译:梦想不可能的梦想:澳大利亚生育政策中的风险排序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Explaining the trajectory of Australian health policies over the last century requires an analysis of different political regimes and their dreams of order for managing risk. Crook reverses the Beckian axiom that risk is the unintended outcome of the failure of industrial societies, arguing for an understanding of risk within a Foucauldian and Actor Network Theory of governmentality. Risk becomes a mechanism for the realisation of different dreams of order. The welfare state was the risk management mechanism of organised capitalism. Individual aspirations of reflexive individuals form the risk management mechanism of neo-liberal regimes. As competing risk discourses destabilise the field of maternity care, key actors (including doctors, midwives, women and policymakers) form themselves into neo-traditional communities in ongoing struggles to have their risk claims institutionalised within policies and protocols that further legitimise their interests. These struggles around risk and power are evident in recent debates over maternity policy in the context of the 2009 Maternity Services Review and the policy aftermath.
机译:要解释上个世纪澳大利亚卫生政策的轨迹,就需要分析不同的政治制度及其对风险管理的梦想。克鲁克逆转了贝克曼的公理,即风险是工业社会失败的意想不到的结果,他主张在福柯尔和行为者网络政府性理论中理解风险。风险成为实现不同秩序梦想的一种机制。福利国家是有组织的资本主义的风险管理机制。反思个人的个人愿望形成了新自由主义政权的风险管理机制。随着竞争性风险论断破坏了孕产保健领域的稳定,主要参与者(包括医生,助产士,妇女和决策者)在不断努力使风险主张制度化以进一步合法化其利益的政策和协议中,将自己纳入新传统社区。关于风险和权力的这些斗争在2009年《产妇服务评论》和政策后果的背景下有关产妇政策的近期辩论中显而易见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号