...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.
【24h】

Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

机译:心房比心室更容易受到电穿孔的影响:心律失常,休克引起的心律不齐和除颤失败。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Defibrillation shock is known to induce atrial stunning, which is electrical and mechanical dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that atrial stunning is caused by higher atrial susceptibility to electroporation vs ventricles. We also hypothesize that electroporation may be responsible for early recurrence of atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We investigated electroporation induced by 10-ms epicardial high-intensity shocks applied locally in atria and ventricles of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 12) using optical mapping. RESULTS: Electroporation was centered at the electrode and was evident from transient diastolic depolarization and reduction of action potential amplitude and maximum upstroke derivative. Electroporation was voltage-dependent and polarity-dependent and was significantly more pronounced in the atria vs ventricles (P <.01), with a summary 50% of Effective Dose (ED50) for main measured parameters of 9.2 +/- 3.6 V/cm and 13.6 +/- 3.2 V/cm in the atria vs 37.4 +/- 1.5 V/cm and 48.4 +/- 2.8 V/cm in the ventricles, for anodal and cathodal stimuli, respectively. In atria (n = 5), shocks of both polarities (27.2 +/- 1.1 V/cm) transiently induced conduction block and reentry around the inexcitable area. Electroporation-induced ectopic activity was a possible trigger for reentry. However, in the thicker ventricles, electroporation and resulting conduction slowing and block were restricted to the surface only, preventing complete block and arrhythmia. The upstroke morphology revealed that the wave front dived below the electroporated region and resurfaced into unaffected epicardial tissue. CONCLUSION: We showed that the atria are more vulnerable to electroporation and resulting block and arrhythmia than the ventricles.
机译:背景技术:众所周知,除颤电击会引起房颤,这是电气和机械功能障碍。目的:我们假设房颤是由于房颤对电穿孔的敏感性高于心室引起的。我们还假设电穿孔可能是导致房颤早期复发的原因。方法:我们使用光学映射技术研究了在Langendorff灌注兔心脏(n = 12)的心房和心室局部施加10毫秒心外膜高强度电击引起的电穿孔。结果:电穿孔以电极为中心,从舒张期瞬时去极化,动作电位幅度和最大上冲导数的减小而明显。电穿孔是电压依赖性和极性依赖性的,并且在心房中比心室中更为明显(P <.01),对于主要测量参数为9.2 +/- 3.6 V / cm,总结出有效剂量(ED50)的50%对于阳极和阴极刺激,其心房分别为13.6 +/- 3.2 V / cm和心室的37.4 +/- 1.5 V / cm和48.4 +/- 2.8 V / cm。在心房(n = 5)中,两种极性的电击(27.2 +/- 1.1 V / cm)都会短暂地引起传导阻滞,并在无法激励的区域周围重新进入。电穿孔诱导的异位活动可能是再入的触发因素。然而,在较厚的心室中,电穿孔和由此导致的传导减慢和阻塞仅限于表面,从而防止了完全阻塞和心律不齐。向上的形态表明波前跳入电穿孔区域的下方,并重新出现在未受影响的心外膜组织中。结论:我们显示心房比心室更容易受到电穿孔并导致心律失常和心律失常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号