...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart and vessels: An international journal >Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients.
【24h】

Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients.

机译:前瞻性和随机研究了三种抗高血压药(氯沙坦,氨氯地平和赖诺普利)在高血压患者中的抗高血压作用和耐受性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We prospectively evaluated the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three different antihypertensive agents, losartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker), amlodipine (calcium channel blocker), and lisinopril (angiotensin-coverting enzyme inhibitor), in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 2-week washout period, 121 patients were randomly allocated to three different groups for 12 weeks. Medications were titrated upward as necessary to achieve the goal office-recorded sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) (defined as SiDBP <90 mmHg or SiDBP > or = 900 mmHg but with a > or = 10 mmHg drop from baseline). Efficacy and tolerability were assessed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of therapy with each regimen. At 12 weeks, significant differences in SiDBP compared with data of baseline were noted in all three groups ( P < 0.001 in all comparisons). Similarly, significant differences in the sitting systolic blood pressure compared with baseline data were also seen for all three groups ( P < 0.001 in all comparisons). The number of patients reaching goal SiDBP were comparable for the three groups: 25 patients (62.5%) in the losartan group, 27 patients (67.5%) in the amlodipine group, and 22 patients (59.5%) in the lisinopril group (not significant). Amlodipine produced a more pronounced reduction in SiDBP than the other two medications, although without statistical significance. Patients receiving lisinopril showed a high incidence of coughing (31.7%). Low leg edema was noted only in the amlodipine group (7.5%). Compared with the amlodipine and lisinopril groups, the losartan group seemed to have relatively fewer episodes (7.5%), and fewer patients (three cases) experienced adverse effects. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that losartan has the same antihypertensive effect, but has superior tolerability compared with the other two drugs. Coughing was a common side effect of lisinopril therapy in our population.
机译:我们前瞻性评估了轻中度高血压患者中三种不同的降压药洛沙坦(血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂),氨氯地平(钙通道阻滞剂)和赖诺普利(血管紧张素覆盖酶抑制剂)的抗高血压作用和耐受性。经过2周的冲洗期后,将121例患者随机分为三个不同的组,共12周。为了达到目标办公室记录的舒张期血压(SiDBP)(定义为SiDBP <90 mmHg或SiDBP>或= 900 mmHg,但比基线下降>或= 10 mmHg),需要对药物进行向上滴定。每种方案在治疗4、8和12周后评估疗效和耐受性。在12周时,所有三组的SiDBP与基线数据相比均存在显着差异(所有比较中P <0.001)。同样,三组患者的坐位收缩压与基线数据相比也存在显着差异(所有比较中P <0.001)。达到目标SiDBP的患者数量在三组中相当:氯沙坦组25例(62.5%),氨氯地平组27例(67.5%)和赖诺普利组22例(59.5%)(不显着) )。氨氯地平比其他两种药物产生的SiDBP降低更为明显,尽管无统计学意义。接受赖诺普利的患者出现咳嗽的几率很高(31.7%)。仅在氨氯地平组(7.5%)中观察到小腿浮肿。与氨氯地平和赖诺普利组相比,氯沙坦组的发作似乎相对较少(7.5%),并且出现不良反应的患者更少(三例)。总之,这项研究表明氯沙坦具有相同的降压作用,但与其他两种药物相比具有更好的耐受性。咳嗽是赖诺普利疗法在我们人群中常见的副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号