首页> 外文期刊>Heart and Lung: The Journal of Critical Care >Viridans streptococcal (Streptococcus intermedius) mitral valve subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) in a patient with mitral valve prolapse after a dental procedure: the importance of antibiotic prophylaxis.
【24h】

Viridans streptococcal (Streptococcus intermedius) mitral valve subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) in a patient with mitral valve prolapse after a dental procedure: the importance of antibiotic prophylaxis.

机译:牙科手术后患有二尖瓣脱垂的患者中的viridans链球菌(中间链球菌)二尖瓣亚急性细菌性心内膜炎(SBE):预防抗生素的重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) is an infection of the heart involving damaged valves or endothelium. The most common organisms causing SBE are the viridans streptococci. Viridans streptococci differ in their propensity to cause SBE, which is related to the ability to adhere to damaged heart valves and endothelium, which is a function of extracellular matrix production. Streptococcus intermedius is a member of the S. anginosus group. S. intermedius is one of the many strains of viridans streptococci and a rare cause of SBE. SBE may result following a high-grade, sustained veridans streptococcal bacteremia in patients with predisposing cardiac lesions. Because viridans streptococci are relatively avirulent pathogens in normal hosts, they usually present as SBE. Some strains of viridans streptococci are inherently more virulent (eg, S. intermedius) and clinically resemble S. lugdunensis or S. aureus. METHODS: We report a case of S. intermedius SBE in a patient with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Throughout the patient's life, she received antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures and never developed SBE. Because of changes in endocarditis prophylaxis guidelines in 2007, recommending no prophylaxis for dental procedures in patients with MVP, she did not receive prophylaxis for a dental procedure 3 months before admission. The change in prophylaxis recommendations was based on the relatively low incidence of endocarditis with certain cardiac lesions. The recommendations were also based on concern for antibiotic resistance from widespread antibiotic use for antibiotic prophylaxis. There has been no appreciable increase in penicillin resistance, and antimicrobial resistance is not an important consideration among the viridans streptococci. The incidence of SBE is not high after dental procedures in patients with MVP, but if SBE occurs, it may result in serious consequence for the patient. RESULTS: In this case, the patient developed S. intermedius, mitral valve SBE complicated by a cerebral vascular accident, and embolic occlusion of her leg. She was given optimal antibiotic treatment with ceftriaxone 2 g (intravenously) every 24 hours plus gentamicin 120 mg (intravenously) every 24 hours (synergy dose) but failed to respond to antimicrobial therapy. Although her S. intermedius bacteremia was rapidly cleared with antimicrobial therapy, sterilization of her vegetation was not accomplished, and during therapy, the size of her cardiac vegetation actually increased in size. Because of therapeutic failure despite optimal antibiotic therapy, the increasing size of her vegetation necessitated mitral valve replacement, which the patient underwent. Reasons for apparent/real antibiotic failure include inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, inadequately dosed antimicrobial therapy, antibiotic "tolerance," or increased pathogen virulence. Her strain of S. intermedius was sensitive to all antibiotics and not due to a tolerant strain bactericidal concentration (MBC) were the same (<0.25 microg/mL). CONCLUSION: In this case, despite optimal antimicrobial therapy, and in the absence of resistance/tolerance, therapeutic failure was best explained on the basis of S. intermedius virulence. The take-home lesson for clinicians is that it is better to err on the side of antibiotic prophylaxis even in patients with low-risk cardiac lesions. Failure to administer antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures may result in SBE and have disastrous consequences for the patient, which, in this case, resulted in a cerebral vascular accident, embolic occlusion of the leg, and mitral valve replacement. In terms of virulence in patients with endocarditis, S. intermedius may resemble S. lugdenesis.
机译:背景:亚急性细菌性心内膜炎(SBE)是心脏感染,涉及瓣膜或内皮受损。引起SBE的最常见生物是绿藻链球菌。弧菌链球菌引起SBE的倾向不同,这与粘附受损的心脏瓣膜和内皮的能力有关,这是细胞外基质产生的功能。中间链球菌是S. anginosus组的成员。中间链球菌是绿色链霉菌链球菌的许多菌株之一,也是SBE的罕见病因。易患心脏病变的患者发生高度持续的Veridans链球菌菌血症可能导致SBE。由于翠绿链球菌是正常宿主中相对无毒的病原体,因此它们通常以SBE的形式存在。绿藻链球菌的某些菌株固有地具有更高的毒性(例如中间链球菌),并且在临床上类似于卢格登氏链霉菌或金黄色葡萄球菌。方法:我们报告一例二尖瓣脱垂(MVP)患者的中间链球菌SBE。在患者的一生中,她都接受了牙科手术的抗生素预防措施,并且从未患过SBE。由于2007年心内膜炎预防指南的变化,建议不对MVP患者进行牙科手术预防,因此入院前3个月未接受牙科手术预防。预防性建议的改变是基于心内膜炎伴某些心脏病变的发生率相对较低。这些建议还基于对广泛使用抗生素预防抗生素产生的耐药性的关注。在青霉素链球菌中,对青霉素的耐药性没有明显增加,并且对抗生素的耐药性也不是重要的考虑因素。 MVP患者在牙科手术后SBE的发生率并不高,但是如果发生SBE,可能会对患者造成严重后果。结果:在这种情况下,患者发展为中间链球菌,二尖瓣SBE并发脑血管意外,腿部栓塞闭塞。给予她最佳的抗生素治疗,每24小时使用一次头孢曲松2 g(静脉注射),每24小时(协同剂量)给予庆大霉素120 mg(静脉注射),但对抗菌治疗无效。尽管通过抗菌治疗可以迅速清除中间人链球菌的菌血症,但并未完成对她的植被的灭菌,并且在治疗过程中,她的心脏植被的大小实际上在增加。尽管进行了最佳的抗生素治疗,但由于治疗失败,她的植被不断增大,因此不得不进行二尖瓣置换术,患者接受了手术。明显/真正的抗生素失败的原因包括不适当的抗微生物治疗,抗微生物治疗剂量不足,抗生素的“耐受性”或病原体毒力增加。她的中间链球菌菌株对所有抗生素敏感,而不是由于耐受菌株的杀菌浓度(MBC)相同(<0.25 microg / mL)。结论:在这种情况下,尽管采用了最佳的抗菌治疗,并且在没有耐药性/耐受性的情况下,最好还是根据中间链球菌的毒力来解释治疗失败。对于临床医生来说,值得一提的是,即使在心脏低风险的患者中,也最好在预防抗生素方面犯错。不对牙科手术进行抗生素预防可能会导致SBE,并给患者带来灾难性的后果,在这种情况下,会导致脑血管意外,腿部栓塞闭塞和二尖瓣置换。就心内膜炎患者的毒力而言,中间链球菌可能类似于lugdenesis。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号