首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: lessons from the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT. Patient Outcomes Research Team.
【24h】

Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: lessons from the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT. Patient Outcomes Research Team.

机译:管理式医疗系统中的临床有效性研究:小儿哮喘护理PORT的经验教训。患者结果研究小组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To highlight the unique challenges of evaluative research on practice behavior change in the "real world" settings of contemporary managed-care organizations, using the experience of the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT (Patient Outcomes Research Team). STUDY SETTING: The Pediatric Asthma Care PORT is a five-year initiative funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study strategies for asthma care improvement in three managed-care plans in Chicago, Seattle, and Boston. At its core is a randomized trial of two care improvement strategies compared with usual care: (1) a targeted physician education program using practice based Peer Leaders (PL) as change agents, (2) adding to the PL intervention a "Planned Asthma Care Intervention" incorporating joint asthma check-tips the participating organizations viewed asthma care improvement as an immediate priority and had their own corporate improvement programs underway. DATA COLLECTION: Investigators at each health plan described the organizational and implementation challenges in conducting the PAC PORT randomized trial. These experiences were reviewed for common themes and lessons research in similar care-delivery settings. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized trials in "real world" settings represent the most robust design available to test care improvement strategies. In complex, rapidly changing managed-care organizations, blinding is not feasible, corporate initiatives may complicate implementation, and the assumption that a usual care Investigators must be prepared to use innovative strategies to maintain the integrity of the study design, including: continuous improvement within the intervention arms, comanagement by researchers and health plan managers of condition-related quality improvement initiatives, procedures for avoiding respondent burden in health plan enrollees, and anticipation and minimization of risks from experimental arm contamination and major organizational change. With attention to these delivery system issues, as well as the usual design features of randomized trials, we believe managed-care organizations can serve as important laboratories to test care improvement strategies.
机译:目的:利用儿科哮喘护理PORT(患者结果研究小组)的经验,强调对当代管理型护理组织的“现实世界”环境中行为行为变化进行评估研究的独特挑战。研究背景:儿科哮喘护理端口是一项为期五年的计划,由美国医疗保健研究与质量局资助,旨在研究芝加哥,西雅图和波士顿的三个管理式医疗计划中改善哮喘护理的策略。其核心是与常规护理相比,两种护理改善策略的随机试验:(1)以实践为基础的同行领导(PL)作为变革推动者的定向医师教育计划,(2)在PL干预中增加“计划的哮喘护理”与联合哮喘检查技巧结合的“干预”参与者组织将改善哮喘护理列为当务之急,并正在实施自己的公司改进计划。数据收集:每个健康计划的研究人员都描述了进行PAC PORT随机试验的组织和实施挑战。对这些经验进行了回顾,以了解在类似护理提供环境中的共同主题和课程研究。结论:“现实世界”环境中的随机试验代表了可用于测试护理改善策略的最可靠的设计。在复杂,瞬息万变的管理式医疗组织中,盲目可行是不可行的,公司的计划可能会使实施复杂化,并且必须假设常规医疗调查员必须准备使用创新策略来保持研究设计的完整性,包括:持续改进干预措施,研究人员和健康计划经理对与状况相关的质量改善计划的共同管理,避免健康计划参与者中被调查者负担的程序,以及预期和最大程度地降低实验装置污染和重大组织变更带来的风险。考虑到这些交付系统问题以及随机试验的通常设计特点,我们认为管理式护理组织可以作为测试护理改善策略的重要实验室。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号