...
首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study.
【24h】

Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study.

机译:紧急护理和不利的临床事件的费用分摊:ED共付额研究的安全性和财务影响发现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of emergency department (ED) copayment levels on ED use and unfavorable clinical events. Data Source/Study Setting. Kaiser Permanente-Northern California (KPNC), a prepaid integrated delivery system. STUDY DESIGN: In a quasi-experimental longitudinal study with concurrent controls, we estimated rates of ED visits, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths associated with higher ED copayments relative to no copayment, using Poisson random effects and proportional hazard models, controlling for patient characteristics. The study period began in January 1999; more than half of the population experienced an employer-chosen increase in their ED copayment in January 2000. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Using KPNC automated databases, the 2000 U.S. Census, and California state death certificates, we collected data on ED visits and unfavorable clinical events over a 36-month period (January 1999 through December 2001) among 2,257,445 commercially insured and 261,091 Medicare insured health system members. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among commercially insured subjects, ED visits decreased 12 percent with the Dollars 20-35 copayment (95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 11-13 percent), and 23 percent with the Dollars 50-100 copayment (95 percent CI: 23-24 percent) compared with no copayment. Hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths did not increase with copayments. Hospitalizations decreased 4 percent (95 percent CI: 2-6 percent) and 10 percent (95 percent CI: 7-13 percent) with ED copayments of Dollars 20-35 and Dollars 50-100, respectively, compared with no copayment. Among Medicare subjects, ED visits decreased by 4 percent (95 percent CI: 3-6 percent) with the Dollars 20-50 copayments compared with no copayment; unfavorable clinical events did not increase with copayments, e.g., hospitalizations were unchanged (95 percent CI: -3 percent to +2 percent) with Dollars 20-50 ED copayments compared with no copayment. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively modest levels of patient cost-sharingfor ED care decreased ED visit rates without increasing the rate of unfavorable clinical events.
机译:目的:评估急诊科(ED)共付额水平对急诊使用和不良临床事件的影响。数据源/研究设置。 Kaiser Permanente-Northern California(KPNC),一种预付费的综合交付系统。研究设计:在一项同时进行对照的准实验纵向研究中,我们使用泊松随机效应和比例风险模型估算了ED访视,住院,ICU入院率以及与更高的ED共付额相对于无共付额相关的死亡人数。特征。研究期始于1999年1月。超过一半的人口在2000年1月经历了雇主选择的ED共付额增加。数据收集/提取方法:使用KPNC自动化数据库,2000年美国人口普查和加利福尼亚州死亡证明,我们收集了有关ED访问和不利的数据。在36个月内(从1999年1月到2001年12月),有2,257,445名商业保险人和261,091名Medicare受保医疗系统成员参加了临床活动。主要发现:在商业保险对象中,急诊就诊在20-35美元共付额(95%置信区间[CI]:11-13%)下降低了12%,在50-100美元共付额(95%CI:下调了23%) 23-24%),而没有共付额。住院,ICU住院和死亡人数并未随着共付额的增加而增加。与没有共付额的ED自付额相比,住院治疗分别减少了4%(95%CI:2-6%)和10%(95%CI:7-13%),而ED共付额为20-35美元和50-100美元。在Medicare受试者中,急诊就诊减少了4%(95%CI:3-6%),而没有共付额的是20-50美元的共付额;共付额不会增加不利的临床事件,例如,与没有共付额的情况相比,采用20-50美元ED共付额的住院率没有变化(95%CI:-3%至+ 2%)。结论:相对较低的急诊护理费用分担水平降低了急诊就诊率,而没有增加不良临床事件的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号