...
首页> 外文期刊>Headache >Aspirin is first-line treatment for migraine and episodic tension-type headache regardless of headache intensity
【24h】

Aspirin is first-line treatment for migraine and episodic tension-type headache regardless of headache intensity

机译:阿司匹林是偏头痛和发作性紧张型头痛的一线治疗方法,无论头痛强度如何

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives.(1) To establish whether pre-treatment headache intensity in migraine or episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) predicts success or failure of treatment with aspirin; and (2) to reflect, accordingly, on the place of aspirin in the management of these disorders. Background.Stepped care in migraine management uses symptomatic treatments as first-line, reserving triptans for those in whom this proves ineffective. Stratified care chooses between symptomatic therapy and triptans as first-line on an individual basis according to perceived illness severity. We questioned the 2 assumptions underpinning stratified care in migraine that greater illness severity: (1) reflects greater need; and (2) is a risk factor for failure of symptomatic treatment but not of triptans. Methods.With regard to the first assumption, we developed a rhetorical argument that need for treatment is underpinned by expectation of benefit, not by illness severity. To address the second, we reviewed individual patient data from 6 clinical trials of aspirin 1000 mg in migraine (N = 2079; 1165 moderate headache, 914 severe) and one of aspirin 500 and 1000 mg in ETTH (N = 325; 180 moderate, 145 severe), relating outcome to pre-treatment headache intensity. Results.In migraine, for headache relief at 2 hours, a small (4.7%) and non-significant risk difference (RD) in therapeutic gain favored moderate pain; for pain freedom at 2 hours, therapeutic gains were almost identical (RD: -0.2%). In ETTH, for headache relief at 2 hours, RDs for both aspirin 500 mg (-4.2%) and aspirin 1000 mg (-9.7%) favored severe pain, although neither significantly; for pain freedom at 2 hours, RDs (-14.2 and -3.6) again favored severe pain. Conclusion.In neither migraine nor ETTH does pre-treatment headache intensity predict success or failure of aspirin. This is not an arguable basis for stratified care in migraine. In both disorders, aspirin is first-line treatment regardless of headache intensity.
机译:目的:(1)确定偏头痛治疗前的头痛强度或发作性紧张型头痛(ETTH)可预测阿司匹林治疗的成功或失败; (2)相应地考虑阿司匹林在这些疾病的治疗中的位置。背景:偏头痛治疗中的分步护理使用对症治疗作为一线治疗,为那些证明无效的人保留曲坦类药物。分层护理根据对疾病的严重程度,在对症治疗和曲坦类药物作为一线治疗药物之间进行选择。我们质疑偏头痛分层护理的两个假设,即疾病的严重程度更高:(1)反映出更大的需求; (2)是对症治疗失败的风险因素,但曲坦类药物并非如此。方法:关于第一个假设,我们提出了一种辩驳性的论点,即治疗的需要是基于对受益的期望而不是疾病的严重性。为了解决第二个问题,我们回顾了6项偏头痛患者中阿司匹林1000 mg(N = 2079; 1165中度头痛,914例严重)和ETTH中阿司匹林500和1000 mg(N = 325; 180中度, 145例严重),其结果与治疗前头痛强度有关。结果:在偏头痛中,为使2小时后头痛缓解,治疗增益小(4.7%)且无显着风险差异(RD)时,患者偏向中度疼痛。对于2小时的疼痛自由度,治疗效果几乎相同(RD:-0.2%)。在ETTH中,为减轻2小时的头痛,阿司匹林500 mg(-4.2%)和阿司匹林1000 mg(-9.7%)的RDs均能减轻剧烈疼痛,尽管两者均无明显意义。对于2小时的疼痛自由度,RD(-14.2和-3.6)再次倾向于严重疼痛。结论:在偏头痛和ETTH中,治疗前头痛强度均不能预测阿司匹林的成败。这不是偏头痛分层治疗的依据。在这两种疾病中,无论头痛强度如何,阿司匹林都是一线治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号