...
首页> 外文期刊>Haemophilia: the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia >Cost minimization analysis to compare activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) and recombinant factor VIIa for haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major orthopaedic surgeries.
【24h】

Cost minimization analysis to compare activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) and recombinant factor VIIa for haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major orthopaedic surgeries.

机译:成本最小化分析,以比较活化的凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(APCC)和重组因子VIIa用于患有骨科手术的抑制剂的血友病患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Benefits of bypassing agents for maintaining haemostasis in major surgeries have been described in the literature; however, their use has a substantial economic impact. This study assessed the cost of FEIBA, an activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) when used in inhibitor patients undergoing major surgeries. After reviewing published literature, a cost minimization model was developed describing dosing regimens recommended and used during major surgeries for FEIBA (pre-operative: 75-100 U kg(-1); postoperative: 75-100 U kg(-1) q 8-12 h days 1-5 and 75-100 U kg(-1) q 12 h days 6-14) and rFVIIa (pre-operative: 90 microg kg(-1); intra-operative: 90 microg kg(-1) q 2 h; postoperative: 90 microg kg(-1) q 2-4 h days 1-5 and 90 microg kg(-1) q 6 h days 6-14). Using a 75 kg patient and US prices, total drug cost was calculated for three scenarios: use of FEIBA or rFVIIa alone and a third case combining rFVIIa pre- and intra-operative and FEIBA throughout a 14-day postoperative period. Dosage amounts of modelled bypassing agents were similar to cases in the literature. Using FEIBA instead of rFVIIa would decrease total drug cost by >50% and save over Dollars 400,000 per surgery. Sequential use of both bypassing agents would increase total drug cost by 9% when compared with FEIBA alone, but would remain >40% lower than rFVIIa alone. Univariate sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of results. As large amounts of bypassing agents are necessary for patients with inhibitors to undergo major surgeries, cost is a major consideration. Use of FEIBA alone or in combination with rFVIIa has emerged as a cost-saving approach.
机译:文献中已经描述了在大手术中使用止血剂维持止血的益处。但是,使用它们会对经济产生重大影响。这项研究评估了FEIBA,一种活化的凝血酶原复合物浓缩物和重组因子VIIa(rFVIIa)在进行大手术的抑制剂患者中的花费。在回顾了已发表的文献之后,开发了一种成本最小化模型,该模型描述了在主要外科手术中推荐和用于FEIBA的给药方案(术前:75-100 U kg(-1);术后:75-100 U kg(-1)q 8 1-5小时-12小时和75-100 U kg(-1)第6-14天12小时)和rFVIIa(术前:90 microg kg(-1);术中:90 microg kg(-1) )q 2小时;术后:第1-5天2-4小时,第90天微克kg(-1),第6-14天第6小时,达90微克kg(-1)使用75公斤患者和美国价格,在以下三种情况下计算了总药物成本:单独使用FEIBA或rFVIIa,以及在术后14天整个手术期间结合使用rFVIIa术前和术中以及FEIBA的第三种情况。模拟的旁路剂的剂量与文献中的情况相似。使用FEIBA代替rFVIIa将使总药物成本降低> 50%,并为每次手术节省超过40万美元。与单独的FEIBA相比,两种旁路药物的顺序使用将使总药物成本增加9%,但仍比单独的rFVIIa低40%以上。单变量敏感性分析证实了结果的鲁棒性。由于具有抑制剂的患者要接受大手术需要大量的旁路剂,因此成本是主要考虑因素。单独使用FEIBA或与rFVIIa结合使用已成为一种节省成本的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号