...
【24h】

Ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon: results of three surgical techniques.

机译:肱二头肌肱二头肌腱远端破裂:三种手术技术的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The results of three different surgical techniques used for the treatment of 46 ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon in 45 patients were evaluated and compared. Mean follow-up time was 14 months. The 46 ruptures were categorised according to the surgical technique used for treatment. In Group I, 17 arms were treated using two incisions and transosseous suture fixation; in Group II, 19 patients were treated using bone-anchor fixation; and in Group III, ten patients were treated using a tie-on-button technique. After treatment, 41 patients (89.1%) had full active range of motion (ROM) and 38 patients (82.6%) had excellent or good strength. The results after treatment in all three groups were satisfactory. Though the outcomes of these techniques were similar, operative time, time to return to regular activity, and time to return to work was shorter in the bone-anchor and tie-on-button groups than that in the two-incision transosseous fixation group.
机译:评估并比较了三种不同的外科技术用于治疗45例肱二头肌远端肌腱破裂46例的结果。平均随访时间为14个月。根据用于治疗的手术技术对46处破裂进行了分类。在第一组中,使用两个切口和经骨骨缝线固定术治疗了17个手臂。在第二组中,有19例接受了骨锚固定治疗。在第三组中,有十个病人使用了系扣式技术治疗。治疗后,有41名患者(89.1%)具有完整的活动范围(ROM),有38名患者(82.6%)具有良好或良好的力量。所有三组的治疗后结果均令人满意。尽管这些技术的结果相似,但骨锚和带纽扣组的手术时间,恢复正常活动的时间和恢复工作的时间要短于两次切口经骨固定的组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号