...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of urology >Is multichannel urodynamic assessment necessary before considering a surgical treatment of BPH? Pros and cons
【24h】

Is multichannel urodynamic assessment necessary before considering a surgical treatment of BPH? Pros and cons

机译:在考虑对BPH进行手术治疗之前是否需要进行多通道尿动力学评估?利弊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common in middle-aged men and could be consequences of multiple etiologies responsible for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), detrusor underactivity (DUA) and/or overactive bladder. When LUTS are suggestive of BOO secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia, a surgical treatment can sometimes be consider. Even if multichannel urodynamic study (UDS) is currently the gold standard to properly assess LUTS, its use in non-neurogenic men is still a matter of controversy. Here, we aim to explore the evidence supporting or not the use of systematic multichannel UDS before considering an invasive treatment in men LUTS.
机译:下尿路症状(LUTS)在中年男性中很常见,可能是造成膀胱出口梗阻(BOO),逼尿肌功能不足(DUA)和/或膀胱过度活动的多种病因的结果。当LUTS提示继发于良性前列腺增生的BOO时,有时可以考虑手术治疗。即使目前多通道尿动力学研究(UDS)是正确评估LUTS的金标准,其在非神经源性男性中的使用仍存在争议。在这里,我们的目的是在考虑对男性LUTS进行侵入性治疗之前,探索是否支持使用系统多通道UDS的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号