【24h】

Cervical epidural anesthesia: a safe alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing cancer breast surgery.

机译:颈硬膜外麻醉:对于接受癌症乳房手术的患者,安全的替代全身麻醉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is the standard anesthesia for patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer. Cervical epidural anesthesia (CEA) is practiced less often because of its reported complications. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CEA as an anesthetic technique for MRM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty breast cancer patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I or II underwent MRM under CEA from September 2004 to January 2006. Anesthesia was induced with 10 ml of 1% lignocaine; adrenaline was administered through an 18-gauge catheter in C(6)-C(7) or C(7)-T(1) epidural space. Postoperative analgesia was maintained with 0.125% bupivacaine through the epidural catheter. RESULTS: In 49 (98%) patients surgery was conducted smoothly under CEA with good analgesia. 44 patients were awake during surgery. Five patients had to be given intravenous sedation with midazolam, and in one case the procedure was terminated after accidental dura puncture. There were no clinically significant variations in perioperative pulse and respiratory rate, and there was no fall in mean arterial blood pressure during the procedure. The mean preoperative anesthesia time and total cost of the procedure was 20.36 + 2.75 minutes and 12.19 + 2.2 pound, respectively. All patients were started on a liquid diet and mobilized 4 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical epidural anesthesia is a safe alternative to GA and was preferred by our patients because of its lower cost and reduced perioperative morbidity.
机译:背景:全身麻醉(GA)是乳腺癌患者接受改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)的标准麻醉方法。颈硬膜外麻醉(CEA)由于报道并发症而较少实践。这项前瞻性研究旨在评估CEA作为MRM麻醉技术的安全性和有效性。患者与方法:2004年9月至2006年1月,对50例ASA(美国麻醉医师学会)I级或II级乳腺癌患者进行了MRM治疗。用10 ml的1%利多卡因诱导麻醉。肾上腺素通过18号导管在C(6)-C(7)或C(7)-T(1)硬膜外腔内给药。术后通过硬膜外导管维持0.125%布比卡因镇痛。结果:在49例(98%)患者中,CEA手术顺利进行,镇痛效果良好。手术期间有44例患者处于清醒状态。五名患者必须接受咪达唑仑静脉镇静,其中一例在意外硬脑膜穿刺后终止手术。围手术期的脉搏和呼吸频率没有临床上的显着变化,在手术过程中平均动脉压也没有下降。术前平均麻醉时间和手术总费用分别为20.36 + 2.75分钟和12.19 + 2.2磅。所有患者均开始流质饮食,并在术后4小时动员。结论:颈硬膜外麻醉是一种安全的替代GA的方法,因其成本较低且围手术期发病率较低而被我们的患者首选。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号