首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Surgery: Official Journal of the Societe Internationale de Chirurgie, Collegium Internationale Chirurgiae Digestivae, and of the International Association of Endocrine Surgeons >Synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy for cushing's syndrome: Laparoscopic versus posterior retroperitoneoscopic versus robotic approach
【24h】

Synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy for cushing's syndrome: Laparoscopic versus posterior retroperitoneoscopic versus robotic approach

机译:同步双侧肾上腺切除术治疗库欣综合征:腹腔镜与腹膜后后视镜与机器人入路

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Synchronous endoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy (BilA) can effectively provide definitive cure of hypercortisolism in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome and in primary adrenal bilateral disease. We compared three different approaches for BilA: transabdominal laparoscopic BilA (TL-BilA), simultaneous posterior retroperitoneoscopic BilA (PR-BilA), and robot-assisted BilA (RA-BilA). Methods: All patients who underwent BilA between January 1999 and December 2012 at two referral centers (one performing TL-BilA and PR-BilA and one performing RA-BilA) were included. A comparative analysis was performed. Results: Twenty-nine patients were included: 5 underwent TL-BilA, 11 underwent PR-BilA, and 13 underwent RA-BilA. No significant difference was found concerning age, gender, diagnosis, and previous abdominal surgery. No conversion to open approach was registered. Operative time was significantly shorter for the PR-BilA group than for the TL-BilA and RA-BilA groups (157.4 ± 54.6 vs 256.0 ± 43.4 vs 221.5 ± 42.2 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found concerning intraoperative and postoperative complications rate and time to first flatus. Drains were used routinely after PR-BilA and TL-BilA and electively in four RA-BilA patients (P < 0.001). Hospital stay was longer in the TL-BilA and PR-BilA groups than in the RA-BilA group (12.0 ± 5.7 vs 10.8 ± 3.7 vs 4.4 ± 1.7 days, respectively) (P < 0.001). No recurrence or disease-related death was registered. Conclusions: Operative time was significantly shorter in the PR-BilA group, because it eliminates the need to reposition the patient. The number of drains and the length of hospital stay were reduced after RA-BilA, but this was likely related to different management protocols in different settings. Because no significant difference was found in terms of postoperative outcome, none of the three operative approaches can be considered the preferable one.
机译:背景:同步内镜下双侧肾上腺切除术(BilA)可以有效地根治ACTH依赖的库欣氏综合征和原发性肾上腺双侧疾病的皮质醇过多症。我们比较了BilA的三种不同方法:经腹腔镜BilA(TL-BilA),同时腹腔镜后BilA(PR-BilA)和机器人辅助BilA(RA-BilA)。方法:纳入所有在1999年1月至2012年12月期间在两个转诊中心(一个进行TL-BilA和PR-BilA以及一个进行RA-BilA)接受BilA治疗的患者。进行了比较分析。结果:包括29名患者:5例接受TL-BilA,11例接受PR-BilA,13例接受RA-BilA。在年龄,性别,诊断和先前的腹部手术方面没有发现显着差异。没有注册为开放方式的转换。 PR-BilA组的手术时间明显少于TL-BilA和RA-BilA组(分别为157.4±54.6 vs 256.0±43.4 vs 221.5±42.2 min)(P <0.001)。术中和术后并发症发生率以及首次肠胃胀气的时间没有显着差异。 PR-BilA和TL-BilA后常规行引流,四例RA-BilA患者可选行引流(P <0.001)。 TL-BilA和PR-BilA组的住院时间长于RA-BilA组(分别为12.0±5.7 vs 10.8±3.7 vs 4.4±1.7天)(P <0.001)。没有发现复发或与疾病相关的死亡。结论:PR-BilA组的手术时间明显缩短,因为它消除了重新定位患者的需要。 RA-BilA术后减少了引流器的数量并缩短了住院时间,但这可能与不同环境中的不同管理方案有关。由于在术后结局方面未发现显着差异,因此三种手术方法均不能被认为是较可取的一种。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号