...
【24h】

Questionnaire versus telephone follow-up to detect postdischarge complications in surgical patients: Randomized clinical trial

机译:问卷调查与电话随访以检测手术患者出院后并发症:随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Postdischarge complications in surgical patients are usually recorded only when readmission is required, a method that likely underestimates the overall complication rate. Our aim was to determine which method - telephone interview or questionnaire by mail- collects the most postdischarge complications. Methods We performed a randomized clinical equivalence trial. From December 2008 until August 2009, all adult surgical patients admitted to a university hospital were randomized to be approached by mail or by phone 30 days after discharge to collect information about postdischarge complications. Primary outcome was the total number of reported complications after discharge. Secondary outcome was the severity of the complications. Results In all, 1595 patientswere reached: 890 by means of a telephone interviewand 705 through a questionnaire.Response rate was higher in the telephone group than in the questionnaire group (63.8%vs. 51.3 %). The percentage of patients reporting one or more complications did not differ significantly between the groups: 43.3%in the telephone group versus 39.6%in the questionnaire group. Length of stay, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, and type of surgery-but not the survey techniques compared here-significantly influenced the number of complications reported. The percentage of patientreported complications requiring treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions The two survey methods did not differ in their ability to appreciate postdischarge complications as reported by the patients. The decision to use either method may be determined by the institution, costs involved, and labor requirement.
机译:背景通常仅在需要再次入院时才记录手术患者的出院后并发症,这种方法可能低估了总体并发症发生率。我们的目标是确定哪种方法(通过电话进行电话采访或问卷调查)收集出院后并发症最多。方法我们进行了一项随机临床等效性试验。从2008年12月至2009年8月,所有入院的成年外科手术患者在出院后30天被随机安排通过邮件或电话联系以收集有关出院后并发症的信息。主要结局是出院后报告的并发症总数。次要结果是并发症的严重程度。结果通过电话访问的方式共有1595名患者:890名患者和通过问卷调查的705名患者,电话组的响应率高于问卷调查组(63.8%比51.3%)。两组之间报告一种或多种并发症的患者百分比没有显着差异:电话组为43.3%,而问卷组为39.6%。住院时间,美国麻醉医师学会等级和手术类型-但此处未比较调查技术-显着影响了报道的并发症数量。两组之间患者报告的需要治疗的并发症百分比没有显着差异。结论两种调查方法对患者出院后并发症的理解能力没有差异。使用哪种方法的决定取决于机构,所涉及的成本和劳动力需求。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号