【24h】

Pros and cons for European shale development.

机译:欧洲页岩开发的利弊。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Dutch applied science and technology company TNO has developed what it calls an "Argument Map" that weighs out the pros and cons European countries must consider when deciding whether or not to allow tracking to develop domestic shale resources. On the pros side, TNO states that the development of shale resources can enhance local energy security while also helping to support other forms of energy development (e.g., geothermal) by generating a knowledge base that can be shared; shale gas is more environmentally friendly in terms of carbon emissions than burning coal or oil and the domestic shale gas production will allow EU members to better control the environmental impact of this development; shale gas can be produced safely as fracking technologies have been proven in North America and real time monitoring can be implemented to ensure that any risks to operators and the local community can be quickly mitigated; shale gas production will also help to prop up the economy in the country by lowering domestic energy costs, creating jobs, and attracting foreign investment; and the development of shale resources will strengthen a country politically as it will be less dependent on imports from countries that could be considered hostile.
机译:荷兰应用科技公司TNO已开发出所谓的“论据图”,权衡了欧洲国家在决定是否允许跟踪开发国内页岩资源时必须考虑的利弊。在有利方面,TNO表示,开发页岩资源可以增强当地的能源安全性,同时还可以通过建立可以共享的知识库来帮助支持其他形式的能源开发(例如地热);页岩气在碳排放方面比燃烧煤炭或石油更为环保,而且国内页岩气的生产将使欧盟成员国能够更好地控制这一发展的环境影响;由于压裂技术已在北美得到验证,因此可以安全地生产页岩气,并可以进行实时监控,以确保能够迅速减轻对运营商和当地社区的任何风险;页岩气的生产还将通过降低国内能源成本,创造就业机会和吸引外国投资来帮助支撑该国的经济;页岩资源的开发将在政治上加强一个国家,因为它将较少依赖来自可能被视为敌对国家的进口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号