首页> 外文期刊>World journal of gastroenterology : >Log-normal censored regression model detecting prognostic factors in gastric cancer: A study of 3018 cases.
【24h】

Log-normal censored regression model detecting prognostic factors in gastric cancer: A study of 3018 cases.

机译:检测胃癌预后因素的对数正态删失回归模型:3018例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIM: To investigate the efficiency of Cox proportional hazard model in detecting prognostic factors for gastric cancer. METHODS: We used the log-normal regression model to evaluate prognostic factors in gastric cancer and compared it with the Cox model. Three thousand and eighteen gastric cancer patients who received a gastrectomy between 1980 and 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinic-pathological factors were included in a log-normal model as well as Cox model. The akaike information criterion (AIC) was employed to compare the efficiency of both models. Univariate analysis indicated that age at diagnosis, past history, cancer location, distant metastasis status, surgical curative degree, combined other organ resection, Borrmann type, Lauren's classification, pT stage, total dissected nodes and pN stage were prognostic factors in both log-normal and Cox models. RESULTS: In the final multivariate model, age at diagnosis, past history, surgical curative degree, Borrmann type, Lauren's classification, pT stage, and pN stage were significant prognostic factors in both log-normal and Cox models. However, cancer location, distant metastasis status, and histology types were found to be significant prognostic factors in log-normal results alone. According to AIC, the log-normal model performed better than the Cox proportional hazard model (AIC value: 2534.72 vs 1693.56). CONCLUSION: It is suggested that the log-normal regression model can be a useful statistical model to evaluate prognostic factors instead of the Cox proportional hazard model.
机译:目的:探讨Cox比例风险模型在检测胃癌预后因素中的有效性。方法:我们使用对数正态回归模型评估胃癌的预后因素,并将其与Cox模型进行比较。回顾性分析1980年至2004年间接受胃切除术的3818例胃癌患者。对数正态模型和Cox模型均包括临床病理因素。 akaike信息准则(AIC)用于比较两个模型的效率。单因素分析表明,诊断年龄,既往史,癌症位置,远处转移状态,手术治愈程度,其他器官联合切除,Borrmann类型,Lauren's分类,pT分期,总解剖结节和pN分期均为对数正常的预后因素。和Cox模型。结果:在最终的多元模型中,在对数正态和Cox模型中,诊断年龄,既往史,手术治愈程度,Borrmann类型,Lauren's分类,pT分期和pN分期均为重要的预后因素。然而,仅根据对数正常结果,发现癌的位置,远处转移状态和组织学类型是重要的预后因素。根据AIC,对数正态模型的表现优于Cox比例风险模型(AIC值:2543.72对1693.56)。结论:建议使用对数正态回归模型代替Cox比例风险模型,可以作为评估预后因素的有用统计模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号