...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of gastroenterology : >Is Dor fundoplication optimum after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia? A meta-analysis
【24h】

Is Dor fundoplication optimum after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia? A meta-analysis

机译:腹腔镜Heller肌切开术治疗门失弛缓症后,Dor胃底复叠术是否最佳?荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIM: To compare the outcome of acid reflux prevention by Dor fundoplication after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia. METHODS: Electronic database PubMed, Ovid (Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, EmBase and Ovid MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library were searched between January 1995 and September 2012. Bibliographic citation management software (EndNote X3) was used for extracted literature management. Quality assessment of random controlled studies (RCTs) and non-RCTs was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 and a modification of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (Version 5.1), and sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially omitting each study. RESULTS: Finally, 6 studies, including a total of 523 achalasia patients, compared Dor fundoplication with other types of fundoplication after LHM (Dor-other group), and 8 studies, including a total of 528 achalasia patients, compared Dor fundoplication with no fundoplication after LHM (Dor-no group). Dor fundoplication was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate of clinical regurgitation and pathological acid reflux compared with the other fundoplication group (OR = 7.16, 95%CI: 1.25-40.93, P = 0.03, and OR = 3.79, 95%CI: 1.23-11.72, P = 0.02, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences between Dor fundoplication and no fundoplication in all subjects. Other outcomes, including complications, dysphagia, postoperative physiologic testing, and operation- related data displayed no significant differences in the two comparison groups. CONCLUSION: Dor fundoplication is not the optimum procedure after LHM for achalasia. We suggest more attention should be paid on quality of life among different fundoplications.
机译:目的:比较腹腔镜Heller肌切开术(LHM)治疗门失弛缓症通过Dor胃底折叠术预防酸反流的结果。方法:检索1995年1月至2012年9月之间的电子数据库PubMed,Ovid(循证医学评论,EmBase和Ovid MEDLINE)和Cochrane图书馆。书目引文管理软件(EndNote X3)用于提取文献管理。随机对照研究(RCT)和非RCT的质量评估分别根据《 Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》 5.1.0和修订的《纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表》进行。使用Review Manager(5.1版)分析数据,并通过依次省略每个研究来进行敏感性分析。结果:最后,有6项研究(共523名门失弛缓症患者)对LHM后的Dor胃底折叠术与其他类型的胃底折叠术(Dor-other组)进行了比较;还有8项研究(共528例失弛缓症患者)比较了Dor胃底折叠术与无胃底折叠术在LHM(Dor-no group)之后。与其他胃底折叠术组相比,Dor胃底折叠术与临床返流和病理性酸返流的复发率显着更高(OR = 7.16,95%CI:1.25-40.93,P = 0.03,OR = 3.79,95%CI:1.23 -11.72,P = 0.02)。另外,在所有受试者中,Dor胃底折叠术和无胃底折叠术之间没有显着差异。其他结果,包括并发症,吞咽困难,术后生理检查以及与手术相关的数据,在两个比较组中均无显着差异。结论:LHM治疗门失弛缓症不是最佳的胃底折叠术。我们建议应更多注意不同胃底折叠术的生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号