首页> 外文期刊>Weed Technology: A journal of the Weed Science Society of America >Glufosinate Efficacy as Influenced by Carrier Water pH, Hardness, Foliar Fertilizer, and Ammonium Sulfate
【24h】

Glufosinate Efficacy as Influenced by Carrier Water pH, Hardness, Foliar Fertilizer, and Ammonium Sulfate

机译:草甘膦功效受载水pH,硬度,叶面肥和硫酸铵的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Carrier water quality is an important consideration for herbicide efficacy. Effect of carrier water pH (4, 6.5, or 9) and coapplied Zn or Mn foliar fertilizer was evaluated on glufosinate efficacy for horseweed and Palmer amaranth control in the field. Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate the effect of: (1) carrier water pH, foliar fertilizer (Zn, Mn, or without fertilizer), and ammonium sulfate (AMS) (at 0 or 2.5% v/v); and (2) carrier water hardness (0 to 1,000 mg L-1) and AMS (at 0 or 2.5% v/v) on glufosinate efficacy for giant ragweed, horseweed, and Palmer amaranth control. In a 2014 field study, control, plant density reduction, and biomass reduction were at least 8% greater for horseweed and at least 14% greater for Palmer amaranth when glufosinate was applied at carrier water pH 4 compared with pH 9. Glufosinate efficacy was at least 10 and 17% greater for giant ragweed and Palmer amaranth control, respectively, with carrier water pH 4 compared with pH 9 in the greenhouse. In the greenhouse studies, coapplied Zn or Mn fertilizer had no effect on glufosinate efficacy. Increased carrier water hardness from 0 to 1,000 mg L-1 negatively influenced glufosinate efficacy and resulted in 20 and 17% lesser control and biomass reduction, respectively, on giant ragweed or Palmer amaranth. Use of AMS enhanced glufosinate efficacy on giant ragweed control in both greenhouse studies, whereas only the Palmer amaranth control was enhanced in the water hardness study. Horseweed control with glufosinate as affected by carrier water pH, hardness, or AMS remained unaffected in both greenhouse studies. Carrier water at alkaline pH or hardness. 200 mg L-1 has potential to reduce glufosinate efficacy. Therefore, carrier water free of hardness cations and at acidic condition (pH = 4 to 6.5) should be considered for optimum glufosinate efficacy.
机译:载体水的质量是除草剂功效的重要考虑因素。评估了载水pH(4、6.5或9)和共同施用的Zn或Mn叶面肥对草铵膦和马Palm菜防治效果的效果。进行了温室研究以评估以下各项的影响:(1)载体水的pH值,叶面肥料(锌,锰或无肥料)和硫酸铵(AMS)(0或2.5%v / v); (2)载水硬度(0到1,000 mg L-1)和AMS(0或2.5%v / v)对草铵膦,豚草和帕尔默a菜的药效。在2014年的一项田间研究中,与草甘膦相比,在pH 4的载水上施用草铵膦时,马草的控制,植物密度降低和生物量降低至少8%,而Palmer mar菜至少大于14%。与温室中的pH值9相比,载有pH值4的豚草和Palmer control菜的防治分别高出10%和17%。在温室研究中,共同施用的锌或锰肥料对草铵膦功效没有影响。载水硬度从0增加到1000 mg L-1会对草铵膦的功效产生负面影响,并且对豚草或棕er菜的控制和生物量减少分别减少了20%和17%。在两个温室研究中,AMS的使用都增强了草铵膦在大型豚草防治中的功效,而在水硬度研究中仅增强了Palmer mar菜防治。在两个温室研究中,草铵膦对马草的控制不受载水pH,硬度或AMS的影响。碱性pH或硬度的载水。 200 mg L-1有降低草铵膦功效的潜力。因此,为获得最佳草铵膦功效,应考虑使用不含硬阳离子和酸性条件(pH = 4至6.5)的载水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号