...
首页> 外文期刊>Weed Technology: A journal of the Weed Science Society of America >Volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn interference and control in glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet.
【24h】

Volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn interference and control in glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet.

机译:抗草甘膦的自愿性玉米干扰和抗草甘膦甜菜的控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) sugarbeet is commonly grown in rotation with GR corn, but there is limited information relating to volunteer GR corn interference or control in GR sugarbeet. Field studies were conducted near Lingle, WY and Scottsbluff, NE in 2009 and 2010 to quantify sugarbeet yield loss in response to volunteer corn density and duration of interference, and determine appropriate control practices for use in GR sugarbeet. Hybrid corn resulted in a similar competitive effect on sugarbeet sucrose yield as clumps of F2 volunteer corn. Clumps of volunteer corn were controlled 81% compared with 73% for individual plants. Linear regression indicated sucrose yield loss of 19% for each corn plant m-2 up to 1.7 plants m-2 at three of four experimental sites. Pearson correlation coefficients between percentage sucrose yield loss and proportion of sunlight reaching the top of the sugarbeet canopy ranged from -0.42 to -0.92. The duration of corn interference required to cause a 5% sucrose yield loss (YL5) ranged from 3.5 to 5.9 wk after sugarbeet emergence (WAE) for hand-weeding or herbicide removal, respectively, due to the length of time herbicide-treated volunteer corn continued to shade sugarbeet plants. Differences between herbicide and hand-removal methods were attributed to the time lag between when the treatments were applied and when the corn ceased to block light from the sugarbeet canopy. Sethoxydim generally provided less volunteer corn control compared with either quizalofop or clethodim, and control increased with the addition of an oil adjuvant. If a grower were to implement a volunteer corn control practice 3.5 WAE, economic sugarbeet yield loss would be avoided. In eastern Wyoming and western Nebraska, the sugarbeet crop will typically have between four to eight true leaves at 3.5 WAE, and therefore this would be an optimal time to control volunteer corn. If volunteer corn is being hand weeded, the YL5 estimate will also increase, and thus the window of time to control volunteer corn would be wider.
机译:抗草甘膦(GR)的甜菜通常与GR玉米轮作种植,但是关于自愿对GR玉米进行干扰或控制GR甜菜的信息很少。在2009年和2010年在怀俄明州Lingle和北卡罗来纳州斯科茨布拉夫附近进行了田间研究,以量化响应志愿者玉米密度和干扰持续时间的甜菜产量损失,并确定用于GR甜菜的适当控制措施。杂种玉米对甜菜蔗糖产量的竞争效应与F 2 志愿玉米块相似。志愿者玉米的团块控制在81%,而单个植物的控制在73%。线性回归表明,在四个实验点中的三个实验点,每株玉米m -2 的蔗糖产量损失高达19%,最多为1.7株m -2 。蔗糖产量损失百分率与到达甜菜冠层顶部的阳光比例之间的皮尔森相关系数在-0.42至-0.92之间。人工除草或除草剂出苗后(WAE),造成5%蔗糖产量损失( Y L5 )所需的玉米干扰持续时间为3.5至5.9 wk分别由于除草剂处理过的志愿玉米的时间长,使玉米继续遮盖甜菜植物。除草剂和手动除草方法之间的差异归因于施药与玉米停止挡住甜菜冠层的光照之间的时间差。相比于喹唑泊普或克来舒定,Sethoxydim通常提供较少的志愿者玉米控制,而添加油佐剂则增加了对玉米的控制。如果种植者实施自愿性玉米控制实践3.5 WAE,将避免经济甜菜产量损失。在怀俄明州东部和内布拉斯加州西部,甜菜作物通常在3.5 WAE时有4至8片真叶,因此这将是控制志愿玉米的最佳时机。如果对志愿者玉米进行人工除草, Y L5 的估算值也将增加,因此控制志愿者玉米的时间窗口将更宽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号