首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Emergency Medicine >Support for a waiting room time tracker: A survey of patients waiting in an urban ED
【24h】

Support for a waiting room time tracker: A survey of patients waiting in an urban ED

机译:支持候诊室时间跟踪器:对在城市急诊室等待的患者的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Emergency Department (ED) crowding and inpatient boarding lead to lengthy wait times for patients, which may cause them to choose to leave without being seen. A new initiative to improve communication with patients is to provide an estimated wait time with a "time tracker" display, but it is unclear whether ED patients would welcome this. Objective: To estimate the proportion of ED patients who would favor a time tracker display. Methods: This survey-based study was conducted from March to July 2010 at an urban academic center. After being triaged, patients were asked to answer a multiple-choice questionnaire, asking their preference toward a time tracker display. Results: Of the 375 patients who were approached, 340 (91%) participated. Two hundred fourteen of them (63%) preferred an ED with a time tracker, 53 (16%) were unsure, and 73 (21%) did not prefer an ED with a time tracker. Patients with low-Acuity conditions (Emergency Severity Index [ESI] 4 or 5) were 1.2 times more likely (95% confidence interval 1.0-1.4) to favor a time tracker than those with higher acuity (ESI 3). Preference was not related to race, age, insurance status, or employment. Conclusions: The majority of patients in our study preferred an ED with a time tracker display (63% for vs. 21% against). Support for a time tracker was higher among patients triaged with lower ESI levels (4 or 5). A time tracker is viewed positively by many patients and may be a beneficial addition in the ED waiting room.
机译:背景:急诊部(ED)的拥挤和住院情况导致患者等待时间过长,这可能导致他们选择不见而离开。改善与患者沟通的一项新举措是通过“时间跟踪器”显示屏提供估计的等待时间,但尚不清楚ED患者是否会欢迎这种情况。目的:评估倾向于使用时间追踪器显示的急诊科患者的比例。方法:这项基于调查的研究于2010年3月至7月在城市学术中心进行。在进行分类后,要求患者回答多项选择调查表,询问他们对时间跟踪器显示的偏好。结果:在375名患者中,有340名(91%)参加了治疗。其中有124人(63%)倾向于使用带时间跟踪器的ED,不确定的有53(16%),而73(21%)不喜欢带时间跟踪器的ED。具有低敏度条件(紧急严重性指数[ESI] 4或5)的患者偏爱时间追踪器的可能性(具有较高敏锐度的患者(ESI 3))是其1.2倍(95%置信区间1.0-1.4)。偏好与种族,年龄,保险身份或工作无关。结论:在我们的研究中,大多数患者偏爱带有时间跟踪显示的ED(63%vs. 21%)。 ESI水平较低(4或5)的患者中,对时间跟踪器的支持更高。时间跟踪器受到许多患者的积极评价,可能是急诊室的有益补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号