首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Emergency Medicine >Predictors of fluid resuscitation in pediatric trauma patients.
【24h】

Predictors of fluid resuscitation in pediatric trauma patients.

机译:小儿创伤患者液体复苏的预测指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) is accepted as the standard for the first hours of trauma care. However, ATLS is designed primarily for adults. In children, vascular access can be difficult and time-consuming. Due to the differences in the epidemiology of children suffering traumatic injury, they may not require aggressive fluid resuscitation. The objective of the study was to establish predictors of fluid resuscitation, and to determine whether all pediatric Level I Trauma victims require two intravenous catheters. Medical charts of all patients aged < 18 years meeting Level I Trauma criteria who presented to Childrens Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) between January 1 and December 31, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 152 patients reviewed with a median age of 6 years (range 4 months to 17 years); 64% were boys. The mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash 49%, fall 37%, crush 8%, gunshot 5%, and knife 1%. Injuries included closed head 88%, penetrating abdomen/chest 6%, and other 6%. Vital signs over time showed no change in 59%, got better in 34%, and got worse in 7%. Fluid resuscitation included no bolus in 70%, 1 bolus in 20%, 2 boluses in 7%, > 2 boluses in 3%. The ICU admitted 23%, 12% were intubated, survival was 95%, and 59% received a prehospital i.v. The i.v. #1 site: antecubital 51%, hand 41%, foot 5%, femoral 1%. The i.v. #2 site: hand 30%, antecubital 20%, foot 2%, none 48%. T test showed no statistically significant differences in fluid resuscitation or second i.v. placement based on the mechanism of injury. T test for unequal variances showed a statistically significant difference in means with p < 0.001 for second i.v. placement as compared with only i.v. fluid amount, age, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Revised Trauma Score was the only predictor of worsening of vital signs (logistic regression [LR], p < 0.001). Age was the only predictor of second i.v. placement (LR, p < 0.03). ISS was the only predictor of a bolus being given (LR, p < 0.01). In our study, blunt trauma occurred in 90% of children, with 10% requiring > 1 fluid bolus. ISS was the only predictor of the need for fluid resuscitation and is not likely to be helpful in the clinical setting. In our population, nearly 50% had no second i.v. This preliminary review of the nature of pediatric trauma suggests that ATLS guidelines may not always be appropriate for the management of pediatric trauma.
机译:高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)被接受为创伤护理最初几个小时的标准。但是,ATLS主要是为成人设计的。在儿童中,血管通路可能既困难又费时。由于遭受外伤的儿童的流行病学差异,他们可能不需要积极的液体复苏。这项研究的目的是建立液体复苏的预测指标,并确定所有小儿I级创伤患者是否需要两个静脉导管。回顾性回顾了1999年1月1日至12月31日期间提交给洛杉矶儿童医院(CHLA)的所有符合I级创伤标准的18岁以下患者的病历。回顾了152例患者,中位年龄为6岁(4个月至17岁); 64%是男孩。伤害发生的机理是汽车碰撞49%,跌落37%,撞车8%,枪击5%和刀1%。受伤包括闭合的头部88%,穿透腹部/胸部6%和其他6%。随时间变化的生命体征显示无变化,占59%,好转占34%,差于7%。液体复苏包括70%无推注,20%无推注,7%推注2次推注,3%大于2次推注。重症监护病房(ICU)接受了23%,12%的患者插管,生存率为95%,59%的患者接受了院前静脉内注射。 i.v. #1部位:肘前51%,手41%,脚5%,股骨1%。 i.v. #2位:手30%,肘前20%,脚2%,无48%。 T检验显示液体复苏或第二次静脉输注没有统计学上的显着差异。根据伤害机制进行安置。对于不等方差的T检验显示,均值的统计学差异显着,第二次静脉内p <0.001。与仅i.v.体液量,年龄和损伤严重度评分(ISS)。修订的创伤评分是生命体征恶化的唯一预测因子​​(逻辑回归[LR],p <0.001)。年龄是第二次i.v.位置(LR,p <0.03)。 ISS是给予大剂量的唯一预测因素(LR,p <0.01)。在我们的研究中,90%的儿童发生钝性创伤,其中10%的儿童需要大于1次液体推注。 ISS是需要进行液体复苏的唯一预测因素,在临床环境中可能无济于事。在我们的人口中,将近50%的人没有i.v.对儿童创伤性质的初步审查表明,ATLS指南可能并不总是适合于儿童创伤的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号