...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Emergency Medicine >'Spider Bite' Lesions are Usually Diagnosed as Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections.
【24h】

'Spider Bite' Lesions are Usually Diagnosed as Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections.

机译:“蜘蛛叮咬”病变通常被诊断为皮肤和软组织感染。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Many people seek medical attention for skin lesions and other conditions they attribute to spider bites. Prior experience suggests that many of these lesions have alternate causes, especially infections with community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Objectives: This study determined the percentage of emergency department (ED) patients reporting a "spider bite" who received a clinical diagnosis of spider bite by their physician vs. other etiologies, and if the diagnoses correlated with demographic risk factors for developing CA-MRSA infections. Methods: ED patients who reported that their condition was caused by a "spider bite" were prospectively enrolled in an anonymous, voluntary survey regarding details of their illness and demographic information. Discharge diagnoses were also collected and categorized as: spider bite, bite from other animal (including unknown arthropod), infection, or other diagnosis. Results: There were 182 patients enrolled over 23 months. Seven patients (3.8%) were diagnosed with actual spider bites, 9 patients (4.9%) with bites from other animals, 156 patients (85.7%) with infections, and 6 patients (3.3%) were given other diagnoses. Four patients were given concurrent diagnoses in two categories, and 8 (4.4%) did not have the diagnosis recorded on the data collection instrument. No statistically significant associations were found between the patients' diagnostic categories and the demographic risk factors for CA-MRSA assessed. Conclusion: ED patients reporting a "spider bite" were most frequently diagnosed with skin and soft-tissue infections. Clinically confirmed spider bites were rare, and were caused by black widow spiders when the species could be identified.
机译:背景:许多人因皮肤病和其他因蜘蛛咬伤而引起的疾病而寻求医疗救助。先前的经验表明,这些病变中有许多是替代原因,尤其是社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)感染。目的:本研究确定了急诊科(ED)报告有“蜘蛛咬伤”并通过医师与其他病因进行临床诊断为蜘蛛咬伤的临床诊断的百分比,以及该诊断是否与发展CA-MRSA的人口统计学危险因素相关感染。方法:前瞻性地报道了称其病情是由“蜘蛛咬伤”引起的ED患者,他们参加了一项匿名的自愿调查,有关其疾病的详细信息和人口统计信息。还收集了出院诊断并将其分类为:蜘蛛咬伤,其他动物(包括不知名的节肢动物)咬伤,感染或其他诊断。结果:在23个月内共有182例患者入组。被诊断出有实际的蜘蛛咬伤的患者为7名(3.8%),被其他动物咬伤的患者为9名患者(4.9%),有感染的患者为156名患者(85.7%),接受其他诊断的为6名患者(3.3%)。有4名患者被同时诊断为两类,其中8名(4.4%)没有在数据收集仪器上记录诊断。在患者的诊断类别和评估的CA-MRSA的人口统计学危险因素之间未发现统计学上的显着关联。结论:报告为“蜘蛛咬伤”的ED患者最常被诊断为皮肤和软组织感染。经临床证实的蜘蛛叮咬很少见,并且是由黑寡妇蜘蛛引起的,因此可以确定其种类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号