首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of prosthodontics >Long-term survival of complete crowns, fixed dental prostheses, and cantilever fixed dental prostheses with posts and cores on root canal-treated teeth.
【24h】

Long-term survival of complete crowns, fixed dental prostheses, and cantilever fixed dental prostheses with posts and cores on root canal-treated teeth.

机译:完整的牙冠,固定的牙修复体和在牙根管治疗过的牙齿上具有支柱和核心的悬臂固定式牙修复体的长期生存。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: This study investigated the long-term survival of posts and cores on root canal-treated (RCT) teeth restored with complete crowns, fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), 3-unit FDPs, and cantilever FDPs (C-FDPs) made over a period of 16 to 20 years in an undergraduate clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Complete treatment and follow-up records of 1,037 complete crowns, 134 three-unit FDPs, 322 FDPs, and 168 C-FDPs were available for analysis. All RCT teeth studied had a post-and-core buildup. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to evaluate the different types of fixed restorations. RESULTS: For complete crowns, the estimated survival rates at year 18 were 74.9% for the vital group and 79.4% for the RCT group (P = .602). For 3-unit FDPs, the survival rate at year 20 was 83.2% for the vital group and 60.5% for the RCT group (P = .108). For the FDPs, the survival rate at year 20 was 77.4% for the vital group, while for the RCT group with at least 1 RCT abutment, the survival rate was 56.7% (P = .002). ForC-FDPs with vital abutments, the survival rate was 73.5% at year 16, while for the RCT group with at least 1 RCT abutment, the survival rate was 52.3% at year 18 (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in the long-term survival of complete crowns on vital abutments versus post-and-core complete crowns or in the survival of 3-unit FDPs on vital abutments versus those with at least 1 RCT abutment. For FDPs with more than 3 units and C-FDPs, the use of a post-and-core abutment led to significantly more failures.
机译:目的:本研究调查了经过完全冠修复,固定义齿(FDP),3单元FDP和悬臂FDP(C-FDP)修复的根管治疗(RCT)牙齿上的桩和核的长期存活。在本科诊所工作16至20年。材料与方法:完整的治疗和随访记录为1,037个完整牙冠,134个三单元FDP,322个FDP和168个C-FDP可供分析。所有研究的RCT牙齿都有牙核堆积。 Kaplan-Meier生存曲线用于评估不同类型的固定修复体。结果:对于完整的冠,生命组在18年时的估计生存率为74.9%,RCT组为79.4%(P = .602)。对于三单元FDP,生命组的20年生存率是83.2%,RCT组的生存率为60.5%(P = .108)。对于FDP,生命组在20年时的存活率为77.4%,而对于具有至少1个RCT桥台的RCT组,存活率为56.7%(P = .002)。对于具有重要基台的C-FDP,在16岁时的生存率为73.5%,而对于具有至少1个RCT基台的RCT组,在18年时的生存率为52.3%(P <.01)。结论:重要基台的完整冠的长期存活与核心后完整冠的长期存活,以及与至少具有1个RCT基台的生命相比,重要基台的3单位FDP的存活无统计学差异。对于具有3个以上单元的FDP和C-FDP,使用芯柱后基台会导致更多的故障。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号