首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral implants research >Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study
【24h】

Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study

机译:支持单个单位牙冠(SC)和固定义齿(FDP)且具有一个悬臂延伸的植入物的临床和射线照相变化。回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic changes at implants in posterior maxillary and mandibular areas supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one mesial or distal cantilever extension after an observation period of at least 3 years. Material and methods: Seventeen subjects with 19 implant-supported SCs and 21 subjects with 21 implant-supported FDPs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All FDPs were supported by two implants and had a span of 3-4 units. All reconstructions were incorporated in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The mesial and distal radiographic marginal bone loss from baseline (i.e. delivery of the reconstruction) to the follow-up examination was averaged and compared between SCs supporting one cantilever extension with that of implants supporting FDPs adjacent to or distant from the cantilever extension. Changes in mean pocket probing depth (PPD) were calculated and compared between the three groups. Results: The mean observation period was 78.2 ± 34.5 months for SCs supported by one implant and 67.8 ± 29.8 months for FDPs supported by two implants. No implant loss occurred, yielding a 100% survival rate. At baseline, the mean radiographic bone levels ± SD were 2.6 ± 0.3 mm for implants supporting SCs, 2.6 ± 0.3 mm for implants of FDPs adjacent to the cantilever extension, and 2.4 ± 0.5 mm for implants of FDPs distant from the cantilever extension. At follow-up, the corresponding mean bone levels ± SD were 2.7 ± 0.4, 2.7 ± 0.5, and 2.8 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. No statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed comparing the mean marginal bone loss between the three groups. Moreover, mean changes in PPD between baseline and follow-up were not statistically significantly different (P > 0.05) between the three groups. Conclusion: The presence of one mesial or distal cantilever extension in the posterior maxilla or mandible does not jeopardize the marginal bone levels of implants supporting SCs or short-span FDPs after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.
机译:目的:评估观察期至少三年后,在支持单单位牙冠(SCs)和固定式义齿(FDPs)且具有内侧或远端悬臂延伸的后上颌和下颌区植入物的临床和影像学变化。材料和方法:17位受试者(含19个植入物支持的SC)和21位受试者(含21个植入物支持的FDP)符合纳入标准。所有FDP由两个植入物支撑,跨度为3-4个单位。所有重建物均合并在上颌后或下颌骨中。对从基线(即重建的交付)到随访检查的中,远端X线片边缘骨丢失进行平均,并比较支持一个悬臂延伸的SC与支持邻近或远离悬臂延伸的FDP的植入物的SC之间的差异。计算并比较了三组的平均口袋探测深度(PPD)的变化。结果:一个植入物支持的SC的平均观察期为78.2±34.5个月,两个植入物支持的FDP的平均观察期为67.8±29.8个月。没有发生植入物损失,产生了100%的存活率。在基线时,支撑SC的植入物的平均放射线骨水平±SD为2.6±0.3 mm,邻近悬臂延伸的FDP的植入物为2.6±0.3 mm,远离悬臂延伸的FDP的植入物为2.4±0.5 mm。随访时,相应的平均骨水平±SD分别为2.7±0.4、2.7±0.5和2.8±0.5 mm。比较三组之间的平均边缘骨丢失,没有观察到统计学上的显着差异(P> 0.05)。此外,三组之间基线和随访之间PPD的平均变化无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。结论:在平均观察期至少5年后,在上颌后颌或下颌骨中存在一条近中或远端悬臂延伸不会损害支持SC或短跨度FDP的植入物的边缘骨水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号