首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >A study of the use of medicine lists in medicines reconciliation: please remember this, a list is just a list.
【24h】

A study of the use of medicine lists in medicines reconciliation: please remember this, a list is just a list.

机译:关于药物清单在药物和解中的用途的研究:请记住这一点,清单只是一个清单。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Medication history-taking is recognised as a potential source of medication errors and is the subject of the first National Patient Safety Agency/National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Patient Safety Guidance. Medication lists are suggested as a way of improving medicines reconciliation, but, anecdotally, can falsely reassure prescribers that they have an accurate list of medicines if used in isolation. METHODS: Patients in possession of a medicines list on admission to hospital were approached as part of routine care. Data were collated regarding medication-history discrepancies, their source and whether a prescription amendment was made. KEY FINDINGS: One hundred and twenty patients were reviewed and the median time for pharmacists to complete medicines reconciliation was 15 min. Eighty-three patients (69.2%) had only one medication list, 31 (26%) had two, five (4%) had three and one patient (0.8%) had four lists. In total, 447 discrepancies were identified of which 49 (11.0%) were initiated by the patient, including 32 (65.3%) to adjust a dosage regimen or not to comply with a dosing regime. For the 279 (62.4%) discrepancies attributable to secondary care staff, 119 (42.6%) prescribed medicines were omitted unintentionally. For the 119 (26.6%) discrepancies attributable to the primary care medicines lists, 48 (40.3%) related to inadequate or inaccurate information regarding medicine doses, frequency, strength or form. Each patient required a mean of 1.6 amendments to their prescription despite bringing a list of medicines with them. CONCLUSIONS: Medication lists should be interpreted with caution and assessed in combination with other sources of information, particularly the patient or their carer. Strategies to improve medicines reconciliation on admission to hospital are still needed and a single electronic patient record encompassing primary and secondary care medication records would be a positive step forward.
机译:目的:服用药物的历史记录被认为是药物错误的潜在来源,并且是第一份国家患者安全局/国家健康与临床卓越研究所患者安全指南的主题。建议使用药物清单作为改善药物和解的一种方法,但是,轶事地,如果孤立地使用处方药,可能会错误地使处方者确信他们拥有准确的药物清单。方法:将入院时拥有药物清单的患者作为常规护理的一部分。整理有关药物史差异,其来源以及是否进行处方修改的数据。主要发现:审查了120名患者,药剂师完成药物调和的中位时间为15分钟。八十三名患者(69.2%)仅拥有一种药物清单,三十一名患者(26%)具有两种药物清单,五名(4%)具有三种药物清单,一名患者(0.8%)具有四种药物清单。总共发现了447个差异,其中49个差异(11.0%)是由患者引起的,其中32个差异(65.3%)由患者调整了剂量方案或不符合给药方案。对于279名(62.4%)属于二级保健人员的差异,无意中省略了119种(42.6%)处方药。在归因于初级保健药物清单的119个(26.6%)差异中,有48个(40.3%)与有关药物剂量,频率,强度或形式的信息不足或不正确有关。尽管随身携带药品清单,但每个患者平均需要对其处方进行1.6次修改。结论:应谨慎解释用药清单,并结合其他信息来源,尤其是患者或其护理人员,对药物清单进行评估。仍然需要改善入院时药物对账的策略,包含初级和二级护理药物记录的单一电子患者记录将是向前迈出的积极一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号