首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures.
【24h】

Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures.

机译:具有不同骨骼类型的无牙下颌骨的有限元应力分析,支持多种植体上层建筑。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different types of bone on the stress distribution in the mandibular bone supporting a prefabricated bar-type implant prosthesis using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Four finite element models (M) of a completely edentulous mandibular arch were built. The bone types varied from type 1 to type 4 (M1, M2, M3, M4). The arch was restored using a prefabricated bar system supported by four interforaminal implants for the protocol prosthesis. Computer software was used to determine the stress fields. Three unilateral posterior loads (L) of 150 N were exerted on the prosthesis: L1, perpendicular to the prefabricated bar; L2, oblique (30 degrees) in the buccolingual direction; and L3, oblique (30 degrees) in the linguobuccal direction. The maximum principal stress (Omax) and the maximum principal strain (Emax) were obtained for cortical and trabecular bone. Types 3 and 4 bone showed the highest smax (MPa) in the cortical bone (19.9 and 18.2 for L1, 34.6 and 31.3 for L2, and 3.88 and 24.4 for L3, respectively). The maximum principal strain (Emax) was observed in type 4 cortical bone for all loads (1.80 for L1, 2.4 for L2, and 2.36 for L3). The cortical bone in M3 and M4 showed the highest stress concentration in the axial and buccolingual loading conditions. Bone types 1 and 2 showed the lowest stress concentrations. For the linguobuccal loading condition, the cortical bone in M4 showed the highest stress concentration, followed by bone types 3, 2, and 1. Cortical bone in M4 showed the highest strain for all loading conditions. The bone type might not be the only decisive factor to influence the stress distribution the bone supporting an implant prosthesis anchored by a prefabricated bar.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用三维有限元分析来评估不同类型的骨对支撑预制棒型植入假体的下颌骨应力分布的影响。建立了一个完全缺牙的下颌弓的四个有限元模型(M)。骨骼类型从1型到4型(M1,M2,M3,M4)不等。使用预制杆系统对弓进行修复,该预制杆系统由四个椎间孔植入物支持,用于方案假体。使用计算机软件确定应力场。假体上施加了三个150 N的单侧后方载荷:L1,垂直于预制棒; L1,垂直于预制棒。 L2,沿颊舌方向倾斜(30度); L3,在舌颊方向倾斜(30度)。获得了皮质和小梁骨的最大主应力(Omax)和最大主应变(Emax)。 3型和4型骨在皮质骨中显示最高smax(MPa)(L1分别为19.9和18.2,L2为34.6和31.3,L3为3.88和24.4)。在所有负荷下,在4型皮质骨中观察到最大主应变(Emax)(L1为1.80,L2为2.4,L3为2.36)。 M3和M4中的皮质骨在轴向和颊舌负荷条件下表现出最高的应力集中。 1型和2型骨的应力集中最低。对于舌颊部负荷条件,M4中的皮质骨显示出最高的应力集中,其次为3、2和1型骨。在所有负荷条件下,M4中的皮质骨显示出最高的应变。骨类型可能不是影响支撑由预制棒固定的植入物假体的骨的应力分布的唯一决定性因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号