首页> 外文期刊>VINE >Intellectual liabilities: lessons from the decline and fall of the Roman Empire
【24h】

Intellectual liabilities: lessons from the decline and fall of the Roman Empire

机译:智力债务:罗马帝国衰落的教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Intellectual capital theory and practice predominantly focus on measuring and managing intangible assets. However, if one wants to balance the intellectual capital books, one should recognise both intellectual assets and intellectual liabilities. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to present a theoretical framework for measuring intellectual liabilities. Design/methodology/approach - Identifying intangible liabilities is identifying the risk of the decline and fall of organisations. One of the first extensive studies related to the causes of decline and fall is Gibbon's The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. It seems as if the main lessons that were drawn from the study are also applicable to today's business environment. Therefore, the framework that is developed here is based not only on intellectual capital literature, but also on Gibbon's study into the causes of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Findings - The findings are combined in a framework for measuring intellectual liabilities. The main distinction within the proposed framework is the distinction between internal and external liabilities. Internal liabilities refer to the causes of deterioration that arise from the sources of value creation within the organisation. External liabilities refer to the causes of deterioration that come from outside and are beyond the control of the organisation. Originality/value - The article explores a relatively new topic (intellectual liabilities) from a perspective (historical sciences) that is rarely used in management science.
机译:目的-智力资本理论和实践主要集中于衡量和管理无形资产。但是,如果要平衡智力资产账簿,则应同时确认智力资产和智力负债。因此,本文的目的是提供一个衡量智力负债的理论框架。设计/方法/方法-识别无形负债是在识别组织衰败的风险。与衰落和衰落的原因有关的最早的广泛研究之一是长臂猿的《罗马帝国的衰落与衰落》。这项研究得出的主要教训似乎也适用于当今的商业环境。因此,这里开发的框架不仅基于知识资本文献,而且基于长臂猿对罗马帝国衰亡原因的研究。调查结果-调查结果合并在一个衡量智力负债的框架中。拟议框架内的主要区别是内部负债和外部负债之间的区别。内部负债是指由组织内部的价值创造源引起的恶化的原因。外部负债是指导致外部恶化且超出组织控制范围的原因。原创性/价值-本文从管理科学中很少使用的角度(历史科学)探讨了一个相对较新的主题(知识产权)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《VINE》 |2009年第1期|共13页
  • 作者

    Stam C.D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 375C0093;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号