...
首页> 外文期刊>Twin research and human genetics : >Comparing Facial 3D Analysis With DNA Testing to Determine Zygosities of Twins
【24h】

Comparing Facial 3D Analysis With DNA Testing to Determine Zygosities of Twins

机译:将面部3D分析与DNA测试进行比较以确定双胞胎的合子性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare facial 3D analysis to DNA testing in twin zygosity determinations. Facial 3D images of 106 pairs of young adult Lithuanian twins were taken with a stereophotogrammetric device (3dMD, Atlanta, Georgia) and zygosity was determined according to similarity of facial form. Statistical pattern recognition methodology was used for classification. The results showed that in 75% to 90% of the cases, zygosity determinations were similar to DNA-based results. There were 81 different classification scenarios, including 3 groups, 3 features, 3 different scaling methods, and 3 threshold levels. It appeared that coincidence with 0.5 mm tolerance is the most suitable feature for classification. Also, leaving out scaling improves results in most cases. Scaling was expected to equalize the magnitude of differences and therefore lead to better recognition performance. Still, better classification features and a more effective scaling method or classification in different facial areas could further improve the results. In most of the cases, male pair zygosity recognition was at a higher level compared with females. Erroneously classified twin pairs appear to be obvious outliers in the sample. In particular, faces of young dizygotic (DZ) twins may be so similar that it is very hard to define a feature that would help classify the pair as DZ. Correspondingly, monozygotic (MZ) twins may have faces with quite different shapes. Such anomalous twin pairs are interesting exceptions, but they form a considerable portion in both zygosity groups.
机译:这项研究的目的是将面部3D分析与双受精性测定中的DNA测试进行比较。用立体摄影测量设备(3dMD,亚特兰大,佐治亚州)拍摄了106对立陶宛成年双胞胎的面部3D图像,并根据面部形状的相似性确定接合性。统计模式识别方法用于分类。结果表明,在75%至90%的情况下,接合性测定与基于DNA的结果相似。共有81种不同的分类方案,包括3组,3种特征,3种不同的缩放方法和3种阈值水平。似乎具有0.5 mm公差的重合是最适合分类的特征。同样,在大多数情况下,不进行缩放也可以改善结果。缩放被期望使差异的大小相等,并因此导致更好的识别性能。尽管如此,更好的分类功能和更有效的缩放方法或在不同面部区域中的分类仍可以进一步改善结果。在大多数情况下,与女性相比,男性对合子性识别的水平更高。错误分类的双胞胎对在样本中似乎是明显的异常值。特别是,年轻的同卵双生(DZ)双胞胎的面孔可能是如此相似,以至于很难定义一个有助于将该对归类为DZ的特征。相应地,单卵双生(MZ)双胞胎的脸型可能会完全不同。这样的异常双胞胎对是有趣的例外,但是它们在两个接合性组中构成相当大的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号