...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Clinical Pathology >Comparative clinical study of canine and feline total blood cell count results with seven in-clinic and two commercial laboratory hematology analyzers
【24h】

Comparative clinical study of canine and feline total blood cell count results with seven in-clinic and two commercial laboratory hematology analyzers

机译:使用七个诊所和两个商用实验室血液学分析仪进行犬和猫总血细胞计数结果的比较临床研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: A CBC is an integral part of the assessment of health and disease in companion animals. While in the past newer technologies for CBC analysis were limited to large clinical pathology laboratories, several smaller and affordable automated hematology analyzers have been developed for in-clinic use. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare CBC results generated by 7 in-clinic laser- and impedance-based hematology instruments and 2 commercial laboratory analyzers. Methods: Over a 3-month period, fresh EDTA-anticoagulated blood samples from healthy and diseased dogs (n=260) and cats (n=110) were analyzed on the LaserCyte, ForCyte, MS45, Heska CBC, Scil Vet ABC, VetScan HMT, QBC Vet Autoread, CELL-DYN 3500, and ADVIA 120 analyzers. Results were compared by regression correlation (linear, Deming, Passing-Bablok) and Bland-Altman bias plots using the ADVIA as the criterion standard for all analytes except HCT, which was compared with manual PCV. Precision, linearity, and carryover also were evaluated. Results: For most analytes, the in-clinic analyzers and the CELL-DYN performed similarly and correlated well with the ADVIA. The biases ranged from -0.6 to 2.4 x 10(9)/L for WBC count, 0 to 0.9 x 10(12)/L for RBC count, -1.5 to 0.7 g/dL for hemoglobin concentration, -4.3 to 8.3 fL for MCV, and -69.3 to 77.2 x 10(9)/L for platelet count. Compared with PCV, the HCT on most analyzers had a bias from 0.1% to 7.2%. Canine reticulocyte counts on the LaserCyte and ForCyte correlated but had a negative bias compared with those on the ADVIA. Precision, linearity, and carryover results were excellent for most analyzers. Conclusions: Total WBC and RBC counts were acceptable on all in-clinic hematology instruments studied, with limitations for some RBC parameters and platelet counts. Together with evaluation of a blood film, these in-clinic instruments can provide useful information on canine and feline patients in veterinary practices.
机译:背景:CBC是评估伴侣动物健康和疾病的组成部分。过去,用于CBC分析的较新技术仅限于大型临床病理实验室,但已开发出一些更小型且价格合理的自动血液分析仪供临床使用。目的:本研究的目的是比较7台基于临床的基于激光和阻抗的血液学仪器和2台商用实验室分析仪产生的CBC结果。方法:在3个月的时间里,分别在LaserCyte,ForCyte,MS45,Heska CBC,Scil Vet ABC,VetScan上分析了来自健康和患病狗(n = 260)和猫(n = 110)的新鲜EDTA抗凝血样HMT,QBC Vet Autoread,CELL-DYN 3500和ADVIA 120分析仪。使用ADVIA作为除HCT以外的所有分析物的标准标准,通过回归相关性(线性,戴明,Passing-Bablok)和Bland-Altman偏差图比较了结果,并与手动PCV进行了比较。还评估了精度,线性度和残留。结果:对于大多数分析物,临床分析仪和CELL-DYN表现相似,并且与ADVIA相关性很好。 WBC计数的偏差范围为-0.6至2.4 x 10(9)/ L,RBC计数的偏差范围为0至0.9 x 10(12)/ L,血红蛋白浓度的偏差范围为-1.5至0.7 g / dL,FBC的偏差范围为-4.3至8.3 fL MCV,血小板计数为-69.3至77.2 x 10(9)/ L。与PCV相比,大多数分析仪的HCT偏差为0.1%至7.2%。 LaserCyte和ForCyte上的犬网织红细胞计数相关,但与ADVIA上的相比有负偏倚。对于大多数分析仪而言,精​​度,线性和结转结果都非常出色。结论:在所有研究的血液学血液学仪器中,WBC和RBC的总计数是可以接受的,但某些RBC参数和血小板计数受到限制。这些临床仪器与血膜评估一起,可以为兽医实践中的犬科动物和猫科动物提供有用的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号