首页> 外文期刊>Vascular and endovascular surgery >A comparison of patch angioplasty and stenting for axillary venous stenoses of thrombosed hemodialysis grafts.
【24h】

A comparison of patch angioplasty and stenting for axillary venous stenoses of thrombosed hemodialysis grafts.

机译:血栓性血液透析移植物的腋窝静脉狭窄的补片血管成形术和支架置入的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The efficacy of balloon angioplasty with stent placement is compared to surgical patch angioplasty for thrombosed upper arm hemodialysis grafts with stenotic lesions at the venous anastomosis. Patients with thrombosed hemodialysis grafts terminating at the axillary vein were reviewed. Thirty-eight stents were placed after thrombectomy and venous balloon angioplasty in 26 patients. Fifteen case-matched controls underwent 23 polytetrafluoroethylene patch angioplasties for similar lesions. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for statistical comparison. Primary patency for stent placement compared with patch angioplasty was not statistically different at any time through 1-year follow-up (37% vs 55% at 3 months, 25% vs 45% at 6 months, and 25% vs 15% at 12 months, respectively; p = 0.37). Secondary patency rates were slightly better for patch angioplasty compared with stent placement (78% vs 59% at 3 months, 78% vs 48% at 6 months, and 54% vs 32% at 12 months, respectively) however these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.13). There was no difference in complication rates between groups. Sustained patency is poor for both angioplasty with stent placement and surgical patch angioplasty when revising thrombosed dialysis grafts with anastomotic axillary vein stenosis. These data suggest slightly better patency for the routine use of patch angioplasty for these lesions. However, the endovascular approach appears to be a reasonable alternative when surgical exposure is difficult.
机译:将带支架置入的球囊血管成形术的功效与针对静脉吻合处狭窄病变的血栓性上臂血液透析移植物的外科修补血管成形术进行了比较。回顾了终止于腋静脉的血栓性血液透析移植物的患者。在26例患者中,在血栓切除和静脉球囊成形术后放置了38个支架。 15例匹配的对照患者接受了23例聚四氟乙烯贴片血管成形术治疗相似的病变。 Kaplan-Meier生存分析用于统计学比较。在1年的随访中,支架置入术与斑块血管成形术的主要通畅率在任何时候都没有统计学差异(3个月时为37%vs 55%,6个月时为25%vs 45%,而12个月时为25%vs 15%)月; p = 0.37)。与支架置入相比,贴片血管成形术的二次通畅率稍好(3个月时分别为78%vs 59%,6个月时分别为78%vs 48%和12个月时分别为54%vs 32%),但是这些差异在统计学上没有统计学意义显着性(p = 0.13)。两组之间的并发症发生率没有差异。修订带有吻合腋窝静脉狭窄的血栓性透析移植物时,支架置入的血管成形术和手术贴片血管成形术的持续通畅性均较差。这些数据表明,对于这些病变,常规使用补片血管成形术通畅性更好。但是,当难以进行手术暴露时,血管内方法似乎是一种合理的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号