首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Cavocaval adult liver transplantation and retransplantation without venovenous bypass and without portocaval shunting: a prospective feasibility study in adult liver transplantation.
【24h】

Cavocaval adult liver transplantation and retransplantation without venovenous bypass and without portocaval shunting: a prospective feasibility study in adult liver transplantation.

机译:成人无肝脏静脉曲张和门腔分流的无创成人肝移植和再移植:成年肝移植的前瞻性可行性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The original method of liver transplantation (LT) included recipient inferior vena cava (IVC) resection and the use of extracorporeal venovenous bypass (VVB). Refinements in technique permit transplantation to be done with IVC preservation and without VVB use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and November 2000, 202 consecutive grafts were performed in 188 adults (>/=16 years of age). Twelve patients (6.4%) received two and three retransplants (re-LT). Split grafting was performed 19 times (19 of 202 grafts, 9.4%). Risk factors included United Network of Organ Sharing status I (n=30, 16%), previous right upper abdominal surgery (n=32, 17.1%), caudate lobe encirclement of IVC (n=65, 32.2%), IVC (n=24, 11.9%), and splanchnic venous modification (n=58, 30.9%), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (n=34, 16.8%), giant (>5 kg) liver tumor (n=6, 3%), septic necrosis of the caudate lobe (n=1, 0.5%), and previous cavocaval (n=13, 6.4%) or classical LT (n=5, 2.5%). RESULTS: IVC preservation, avoidance of IVC cross clamping and of VVB use were possible in 98.9%, 93%, and 99.5% of 183 primary LT and in 89.5%, 84.2%, and 89.5% of 19 re-LT. Temporary portocaval shunting was never applied. Perioperative mortality was 1.2%. There was no allotransfusion in 73 (36%) grafts and 45 (22%) patients were immediately extubated. Permanent hepatic vein and caval problems were encountered in three (1.5%) grafts. One patient needed stent placement to treat IVC stenosis. Actual 3- and 12-month patient survival for whole, re-LT, and right-lobe split LT groups were 94.7%, 94.1%, 94.7%, 88.2%, 94.1%, and 89%. Three-month graft survival rates for these groups were 92.6%, 94.7%, and 84.2%. CONCLUSIONS: LT with IVC preservation and without VVB use and portocaval shunting is possible in nearly all primary transplants and in the majority of re-LT.
机译:背景:肝移植(LT)的原始方法包括接受下腔静脉(IVC)切除术和体外静脉旁路(VVB)的使用。技术上的改进允许在保留IVC且不使用VVB的情况下进行移植。材料与方法:在1993年11月至2000年11月之间,对188名成人(> / = 16岁)进行了202次连续移植。 12名患者(6.4%)接受了两次和三次再移植(re-LT)。分割接枝进行了19次(202支中的19支,占9.4%)。危险因素包括联合器官共享网络状态I(n = 30,16%),先前的右上腹部手术(n = 32,17.1%),IVC的尾状叶包围(n = 65,32.2%),IVC(n = 24,11.9%)和内脏静脉修饰(n = 58,30.9%),经颈静脉肝内门体支架分流术(n = 34,16.8%),巨大(> 5 kg)肝肿瘤(n = 6,3%) ,尾状叶的败血性坏死(n = 1,0.5%)和先前的腔隙性(n = 13,6.4%)或经典LT(n = 5,2.5%)。结果:183例原发性LT中有98.9%,93%和99.5%的IVC得以保存,避免IVC交叉钳夹和VVB的使用,而19例LT中有89.5%,84.2%和89.5%的IVC得以保留。临时门腔分流从未应用。围手术期死亡率为1.2%。 73例(36%)移植物中未进行同种异体输血,有45例(22%)患者立即拔管。在三(1.5%)个移植物中遇到了永久性肝静脉和腔的问题。一名患者需要放置支架以治疗IVC狭窄。完整,再LT和右叶分裂LT组的实际3个月和12个月患者存活率为94.7%,94.1%,94.7%,88.2%,94.1%和89%。这些组的三个月移植物存活率分别为92.6%,94.7%和84.2%。结论:在几乎所有原发移植和大多数re-LT中,保留IVC且不使用VVB和门腔分流的LT都是可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号