...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Association of immunosuppressive maintenance regimens with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in kidney transplant recipients.
【24h】

Association of immunosuppressive maintenance regimens with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in kidney transplant recipients.

机译:肾脏移植受者免疫抑制维持方案与移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The association of immunosuppressive regimens (ISRs) with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) may be related with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) recipient serostatus. METHODS: We selected primary kidney transplant recipients from Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database (2000-2009) who were discharged with a functioning graft and were receiving an ISR including an antiproliferative drug and a calcineurin inhibitor as follows: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolate sodium+tacrolimus (TAC), MMF+cyclosporine A (CsA); mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)+TAC; and mTORi+CsA. Adjusted risks of PTLD, rejection, death, and graft failure were examined in all recipients and compared between EBV+ and EBV- recipients. RESULTS: Of 114,025 recipients, 754 developed PTLD (5-year incidence of 0.84%). Adjusted hazard ratio for PTLD was 4.39 (95% CI: 3.60-5.37) for EBV- versus EBV+ recipients; and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.03-1.90) for mTORi+TAC, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.65-0.99) for MMF+CsA, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.57-1.42) for mTORi+CsA, versus MMF+TAC users. In EBV- recipients, hazard ratio for PTLD was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.28-3.07) for mTORi+TAC, 0.45 (95% CI: 0.28-0.72) for MMF+CsA, and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.39-1.80) for mTORi+CsA users versus MMF+TAC. No difference was seen in EBV+ recipient groups. Rejection rates were higher among MMF+CsA recipients in both EBV groups. Death and graft failure risk were increased in all EBV+ISR groups, while in EBV- these risks were only increased in mTORi+TAC group versus MMF+TAC. CONCLUSIONS: In EBV- recipients, immunosuppression with mTORi+TAC was associated with increased risk of PTLD, death, and graft failure, while MMF+CsA use was associated with a trend to increased risk of rejection, lower PTLD risk, and similar risk for graft failure when compared with MMF+TAC.
机译:背景:免疫抑制方案(ISR)与移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病(PTLD)的关联可能与爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)受体的血清状态有关。方法:我们从器官采购移植网络/器官共享联合网络(2000-2009年)中选择了原发性肾移植受者,这些患者随功能性移植物出院并接受包括抗增殖药和钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的ISR,如下所示:霉酚酸酯(MMF)/麦考酚酸钠+他克莫司(TAC),MMF +环孢素A(CsA);雷帕霉素抑制剂(mTORi)+ TAC的哺乳动物靶标;和mTORi + CsA。在所有接受者中检查了调整后的PTLD,排斥,死亡和移植失败的风险,并在EBV +和EBV-接受者之间进行了比较。结果:在114,025名接受者中,有754名发生了PTLD(5年发生率为0.84%)。 EBV-和EBV +受体的PTLD调整后危险比为4.39(95%CI:3.60-5.37); mTORi + TAC为1.40(95%CI:1.03-1.90),MMF + CsA为0.80(95%CI:0.65-0.99),mTORi + CsA为0.90(95%CI:0.57-1.42),而MMF + TAC用户。在EBV感染者中,mTORi + TAC的PTLD危险比为1.98(95%CI:1.28-3.07),MMF + CsA的为0.45(95%CI:0.28-0.72),以及0.84(95%CI:0.39-1.80) ),适用于mTORi + CsA用户和MMF + TAC。在EBV +受体组中未见差异。在两个EBV组中,MMF + CsA接受者的排斥率较高。在所有EBV + ISR组中,死亡和移植失败的风险均增加,而在EBV中,仅mTORi + TAC组与MMF + TAC组相比,这些风险增加。结论:在EBV受体中,mTORi + TAC的免疫抑制与PTLD,死亡和移植失败的风险增加相关,而MMF + CsA的使用与排斥风险增加,PTLD风险降低和类似风险相关。与MMF + TAC相比,移植失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号