首页> 外文期刊>The oncologist >Calcium and magnesium prophylaxis for oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity: Is it a trade-off between drug efficacy and toxicity?
【24h】

Calcium and magnesium prophylaxis for oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity: Is it a trade-off between drug efficacy and toxicity?

机译:钙和镁预防奥沙利铂相关的神经毒性:是否需要在药效和毒性之间进行权衡?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The improvement in the treatment of cancer patients achieved by oncologists over the last decades allowing longer survival times associated with the more effective management of several major side effects of antineoplastic chemotherapy (e.g., myelosuppression and emesis) permitted other toxicities to emerge as clinically relevant issues. At the same time, the greater number of long-term cancer survivors indicates the need for an even more serious consideration of the quality of life of these patients [1,2], with rigorous attempts to quantify its impairment and to improve it through different pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. With this background, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) represents one of the most serious side effects experienced by patients treated with platinum drugs, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, epothilones, bortezomib, and thalidomide [3,4]. In fact, all these drugs used to treat a wide spectrum of solid and hemato-logical malignancies can induce severe CIPN in a proportion of cancer patients, and its severity can be dose-limiting [5].
机译:在过去的几十年中,肿瘤学家对癌症患者的治疗有所改善,使得更长的生存时间与更有效地控制抗肿瘤化学疗法的几种主要副作用(例如骨髓抑制和呕吐)相关联,使得其他毒性成为临床相关问题。同时,更多的长期癌症幸存者表明需要更认真地考虑这些患者的生活质量[1,2],并通过严格的尝试量化其损伤并通过不同的方法加以改善药理学和非药理学方法。在这种背景下,化疗诱导的周围神经毒性(CIPN)代表了接受铂类药物,紫杉烷类,长春花生物碱,埃坡霉素,硼替佐米和沙利度胺治疗的患者所经历的最严重的副作用之一[3,4]。实际上,所有用于治疗多种实体和血液系统恶性肿瘤的药物均可在一定比例的癌症患者中诱发严重的CIPN,其严重性可能会限制剂量[5]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号