首页> 外文期刊>Topics in geriatric rehabilitation >Cultural Adaptation of the Friendship Scale and Health-Related Quality of Life and Functional Mobility Parameters of the Elderly Living at Home and in the Nursing Home
【24h】

Cultural Adaptation of the Friendship Scale and Health-Related Quality of Life and Functional Mobility Parameters of the Elderly Living at Home and in the Nursing Home

机译:在家中和疗养院中老年人的友谊量表的文化适应性以及与健康有关的生活质量和功能流动性参数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim: The aim of our study is to validate the Friendship Scale IFS) for the Turkish population and to evaluate the differences between the socia! isolation parameters, health-related quality of life, and functional mobility in the elderly people !iving at home and at the nursing home. Methods: One hundred sixteen elderly people, 65 years and older, living at home and the nursing home were recruited in the study. Nottingham Health Profile was used to assess the wealth-related quality of life, Rivermead Mobility Index for mobility level, and FS for social isolation of the elderly in both groups. Results: Mean age of the participants in the study was 76.10 ± 8.22 years (63-97 years). Seventy-one of 116 cases '.63.5%) were women and 45 (36.5%) were men. No differences were observed between the groups in terms of age and demographic and clinical characteristics (P< .05). Intraclass correlation coefficient score for test-retest reliability was 0.981 (95% confidence interval [Cl] = 0.957-0.991) for the FS. The results showed concurrent validity of the Turkish version of FS and were significantly different between the groups (P = .006). There was no difference between the groups in terms of Rivermead Mobility Index (P - .246). Although there was no difference between the groups in terms of Nottingham Health Profile total score (P = .290), there was a significant difference in social isolation subscale (P = .028). Conclusions: It is thought that the inclusion of mobility, social participation, and integration in the rehabilitation programs of the elderly would be useful to maintain their functional independence, social participation, and psychoso-cial well-being and in increasing health-related quality of life. Regardless of where and in which circumstances they live, all of them have to be supported in their mobility, participation, and social well-being as early as they can.
机译:目的:我们的研究目的是验证土耳其人口的友谊量表(IFS)并评估社会之间的差异!在家中和养老院中的隔离参数,与健康有关的生活质量以及功能性活动。方法:招募了居住在家里和疗养院的116名65岁及以上的老年人。两组均使用诺丁汉健康档案来评估与财富相关的生活质量,Rivermead流动性指数用于衡量流动性,FS用于评估老年人的社会隔离。结果:研究参与者的平均年龄为76.10±8.22岁(63-97岁)。 116例病例中有71例(0.635%)是女性,男性45例(36.5%)。两组之间在年龄,人口统计学和临床​​特征方面均未观察到差异(P <.05)。 FS的类内相关系数得分用于重测信度为0.981(95%置信区间[Cl] = 0.957-0.991)。结果显示土耳其文版本的FS具有并发有效性,并且两组之间存在显着差异(P = .006)。两组之间的Rivermead流动性指数(P-.246)没有差异。尽管就诺丁汉健康状况总评分而言,两组之间没有差异(P = .290),但社会隔离子量表存在显着差异(P = .028)。结论:人们认为,在老年人的康复计划中纳入流动性,社会参与和融合将有助于维持其功能独立性,社会参与和心理社会福祉,并有助于提高老年人的健康相关素质。生活。无论他们生活在何处以及在什么环境下,都必须尽早为所有人提供流动,参与和社会福祉的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号