首页> 外文期刊>Transboundary and emerging diseases >Comparison Between Reverse Line Blot and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay in Diagnosis of Major Tick-Borne Diseases of Cattle in Southern Sudan
【24h】

Comparison Between Reverse Line Blot and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay in Diagnosis of Major Tick-Borne Diseases of Cattle in Southern Sudan

机译:反向印迹和酶联免疫吸附测定法在苏丹南部主要牛T虱病诊断中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

P>The performance of reverse line blot (RLB) in detecting DNA of Theileria parva, Theileria mutans and Babesia bigemina was assessed in comparison with specific antibody detection using indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the same parasites. Among 90 field samples from Central Equatoria state, Southern Sudan, ELISA reported more positive samples than RLB did. The concordance of RLB showed 66.7%, 81.1% and 48.9% relative to the results of ELISA for T. parva, T. mutans and B. bigemina respectively. It has to be borne in mind that the results of ELISA might represent previous infections, while that of RLB would not only reflect an active infection, but also a carrier status. Therefore, the selection of the test would depend on the specific aims of the study.
机译:P>与使用间接酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的相同寄生虫特异性抗体检测相比,评估了反向线印迹(RLB)在检测小花泰勒虫,变形泰勒虫和变形双歧杆菌中的性能。在来自苏丹南部中央赤道州的90个田间样品中,ELISA报告的阳性样品比RLB多。相对于ELISA检测结果,RLB的一致性分别为66.7%,81.1%和48.9%,T。parva,T。mutans和B. bigemina。必须记住,ELISA的结果可能代表以前的感染,而RLB的结果不仅反映了活动性感染,还反映了携带者的状况。因此,测试的选择将取决于研究的特定目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号