首页> 外文期刊>Total Quality Management & Business Excellence >Comparing Quality Management Practices in Hong Kong-owned and Japan-owned Manufacturing Firms in Mainland China
【24h】

Comparing Quality Management Practices in Hong Kong-owned and Japan-owned Manufacturing Firms in Mainland China

机译:在中国大陆的港资和日资制造公司的质量管理实践比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper reports the research that compares quality management practices of Hong Kong-owned (HK sample) and Japanese-owned manufacturing companies (JP sample) in mainland China. The comparison is based on the USMBQA framework and a questionnaire survey. It is found that, although all in mainland China, Japan-owned manufacturing firms implement quality management to a greater extent than their Hong Kong counterparts. It is also found that in the Japanese sample, three quality categories directly contribute to business result, while in the HK sample, only one category directly contributes to business results. In both JK and JP samples, customer focus is found to be directly related to business results. The result is supported by a few previous studies. However, it is rarely pointed out that this finding is different to the general principle of the latest US Quality Award framework where a human-resources focus directly contributes to business results while a customer-focus does not. The result will trigger future research on the validity of quality award models, especially in countries other than the USA.
机译:本文报告的研究比较了中国大陆的香港独资公司(香港样本)和日本独资制造公司(JP样本)的质量管理实践。比较是基于USMBQA框架和问卷调查。研究发现,尽管日本独资制造企业全部在中国大陆,但实施质量管理的程度要高于香港的制造企业。我们还发现,在日本样本中,三个质量类别直接影响经营业绩,而在香港样本中,只有一个类别直接影响经营业绩。在JK和JP样本中,发现以客户为中心与业务结果直接相关。该结果得到先前的一些研究的支持。但是,很少有人指出这一发现与最新的美国质量奖框架的一般原理不同,在最新质量奖框架中,以人力资源为重点直接有助于业务成果,而以客户为中心则没有。该结果将触发有关质量奖励模型有效性的未来研究,尤其是在美国以外的国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号