首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Record fragmentation due to transfusion at multiple health care facilities: A risk factor for delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions
【24h】

Record fragmentation due to transfusion at multiple health care facilities: A risk factor for delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions

机译:多个医疗机构因输血而导致的记录碎片:溶血性输血反应延迟的危险因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Patients transfused at more than one health care facility face safety risks, because their transfusion record is fragmented. Blood group antibodies documented at one facility may be unknown to others. Because many antibodies are evanescent, access to prior antibody records is important for preventing incompatible transfusions and delayed hemolytic reactions. The study goal was to quantify multisite transfusion activity and its impact on antibody record accuracy. Study Design and Methods Patients (n = 100) undergoing hospital transfusion testing were surveyed to determine the locations and dates of any prior transfusions. Also, transfusion records were examined to determine whether patients (n = 200) known to be alloimmunized at one hospital had antibody testing done at another nearby hospital and, if so, how often the results were discrepant. Results Twenty-three percent (23/100) of patients undergoing type-and-screen testing reported receiving transfusions at 24 other facilities. Locations of transfusions that occurred elsewhere were 54.2% (13/24) at eight other in-state hospitals, 12.5% in bordering states, 20.8% in more distant states, and 12.5% during military service. Twenty-one percent (42/200) of patients known to be alloimmunized at one hospital had antibody test results on record at another nearby hospital. Antibody discrepancies were noted in 64.3% (27/42) of cases. The most common discrepancy was the failure of one facility to detect an antibody. Conclusion Multisite transfusions were common. For patients seen at both of two nearby hospitals, antibody records were frequently discrepant. The findings support the need for interfacility sharing of transfusion records, particularly at the regional level.
机译:背景技术在多个医疗机构输血的患者面临安全风险,因为他们的输血记录是零散的。在一个机构记录的血型抗体可能对其他机构未知。由于许多抗体是渐逝性的,因此访问以前的抗体记录对于防止不相容的输血和延迟的溶血反应很重要。研究目标是量化多位点输血活性及其对抗体记录准确性的影响。研究设计和方法对接受医院输血测试的患者(n = 100)进行了调查,以确定任何先前输血的位置和日期。同样,检查了输血记录,以确定在一家医院已知接受同种免疫的患者(n = 200)是否在附近的另一家医院进行了抗体检测,如果是,则发现结果差异的频率。结果接受类型和筛查的患者中,有23%(23/100)的患者报告在其他24家机构接受了输血。在其他八家州内医院中,发生在其他地方的输血地点分别为54.2%(13/24),在边境州是12.5%,在较远的州是20.8%,在兵役期间是12.5%。已知有21%(42/200)的患者在一家医院接受过同种免疫,其抗体测试结果记录在附近的另一家医院。在64.3%(27/42)的病例中发现了抗体差异。最常见的差异是一种设施无法检测抗体。结论多部位输血很普遍。对于两家附近两家医院都看过的患者,抗体记录经常不一致。研究结果支持需要在机构间共享输血记录,特别是在区域一级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号